Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24875441›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews2014

Toxicogenomics and cancer susceptibility: advances with next-generation sequencing.

Baitang Ning, Zhenqiang Su, Nan Mei, Huixiao Hong, Helen Deng, Leming Shi, James C Fuscoe, William H Tolleson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Proteomics and its applications in breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  4. Using FFPE RNA-Seq with 12 marker genes to evaluate genotoxic and non-genotoxic rat hepatocarcinogens.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Regulation of cytochrome P450 expression by microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs: Epigenetic mechanisms in environmental toxicology and carcinogenesis.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review of Ginkgo biloba-induced toxicity, from experimental studies to human case reports.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Aloe vera: A review of toxicity and adverse clinical effects.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2016
    Review
  13. Collaborative studies in toxicogenomics in rodent liver in JEMS·MMS; a useful application of principal component analysis on toxicogenomics.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Baitang Ninga National Center for Toxicological Research , Food and Drug Administration , Jefferson , Arkansas , USA.
Zhenqiang Su
Nan Mei
Huixiao Hong
Helen Deng
Leming Shi
James C Fuscoe
William H Tolleson

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to comprehensively summarize the recent achievements in the field of toxicogenomics and cancer research regarding genetic-environmental interactions in carcinogenesis and detection of genetic aberrations in cancer genomes by next-generation sequencing technology. Cancer is primarily a genetic disease in which genetic factors and environmental stimuli interact to cause genetic and epigenetic aberrations in human cells. Mutations in the germline act as either high-penetrance alleles that strongly increase the risk of cancer development, or as low-penetrance alleles that mildly change an individual's susceptibility to cancer. Somatic mutations, resulting from either DNA damage induced by exposure to environmental mutagens or from spontaneous errors in DNA replication or repair are involved in the development or progression of the cancer. Induced or spontaneous changes in the epigenome may also drive carcinogenesis. Advances in next-generation sequencing technology provide us opportunities to accurately, economically, and rapidly identify genetic variants, somatic mutations, gene expression profiles, and epigenetic alterations with single-base resolution. Whole genome sequencing, whole exome sequencing, and RNA sequencing of paired cancer and adjacent normal tissue present a comprehensive picture of the cancer genome. These new findings should benefit public health by providing insights in understanding cancer biology, and in improving cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingDisease SusceptibilityHumansNeoplasmsToxicogeneticsCancercarcinogenesisenvironmental exposuregenomicsnext generation sequencingtoxicogenomics

Identifiers

PMID24875441
PMCPMC5712441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.