Trial reportJournal of cardiovascular translational research2014
Evaluating the optimal timing of revascularisation in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the TRANSIENT Trial.
Trial report in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plaque characteristics in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and early spontaneous reperfusion.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Article
- Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention in NSTE-ACS: the sun is not hurried by early risers.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with chest pain and a prehospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are preferably treated with immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, patients with normalization of symptoms and ST-segment elevation upon hospital arrival (transient STEMI) received inconsistent therapy due to logistic reasons and the absence of evidence or explicit guidelines. In this trial, the optimal timing of coronary angiography and subsequent revascularisation is investigated in patients presenting with transient STEMI. In this prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trial, 142 consecutive patients with initially acute chest pain and STEMI, whose symptoms and ST-segment elevation resolve upon admission, are randomized to immediate intervention or a delayed intervention. Primary outcome is infarct size measured at 4 days determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Secondary outcomes are left ventricular function and volumes, myocardial salvage and microvascular injury at baseline; the change in left ventricular function, volumes and infarct size at 4 months; and major adverse cardiac events at 4 and 12 months. The TRANSIENT Trial evaluates whether a delayed invasive strategy (according to NSTEMI-guidelines) is superior to an immediate invasive strategy (according to STEMI-guidelines) in patients with a transient STEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.