Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24875173›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2014

Itch elicited by intradermal injection of serotonin, intracisternal injection of morphine, and their synergistic interactions in rats.

H R Moser, G J Giesler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H R MoserDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
G J GieslerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: giesler@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Research Project CoreP01NS047399 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LA MOTTE, ROBERT H · 2004 to 2013
$11.0M
NINDS Center Core at the University of MinnesotaP30NS062158 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
Role of opioid receptors in transmission of itch by spinothalamic tract neuronF31NS077554 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MOSER, HANNAH ROSE · 2011 to 2013
$65k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS077554NINDS NIH HHS NS062158NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS047399NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS062158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used the cheek model of itch and pain in rats to determine the dose-response relationships for intradermal injection of serotonin and α methylserotonin on scratching behavior. We also determined the dose-related effects of intracisternally injected morphine on scratching, effects that were greatly reduced by administration of the opiate antagonist naloxone. We then examined the interactions of intradermal injection of serotonin and intracisternal injection of morphine on scratching and found that the two procedures act synergistically to increase itch. These results suggest that morphine applied to the CNS is capable of producing itch and greatly increasing itch originating in the skin (hyperknesis).

Indexed as

AnimalsCheekCisterna MagnaDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleGroomingInjections, IntradermalMaleMorphineMotor ActivityPainPruritusRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySerotoninMorphineSerotoninhyperknesisintracisternal injectionitchmorphineserotonin

Identifiers

PMID24875173
PMCPMC4100339
OpenAlexW1978671257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.