Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24874916›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2014

Erythrocyte folate concentrations, CpG methylation at genomically imprinted domains, and birth weight in a multiethnic newborn cohort.

Cathrine Hoyo, Anne Kjersti Daltveit, Edwin Iversen, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon, Bernard Fuemmeler, Joellen Schildkraut, Amy P Murtha, Francine Overcash, Adriana C Vidal, Frances Wang and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Cathrine HoyoDepartment of Biological Sciences; North Carolina State University; Raleigh, NC USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Clinical Epidemiology; School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Anne Kjersti DaltveitDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care; University of Bergen; Bergen, Norway.
Edwin IversenDepartment of Statistics; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Sara E Benjamin-NeelonDepartment of Community and Family Medicine; Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Global Health Institute; Durham, NC USA.
Bernard FuemmelerDepartment of Community and Family Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Joellen SchildkrautDepartment of Community and Family Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Amy P MurthaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine; School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Francine OvercashDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Clinical Epidemiology; School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Adriana C VidalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Clinical Epidemiology; School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Frances WangDepartment of Community and Family Medicine; Duke Cancer Institute; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Zhiqing HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Gynecologic Oncology; School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Joanne KurtzbergDuke University Department of Pediatrics; Duke Cancer Institute; School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Victoria SeewaldtDepartment of Medicine; Division of Oncology; School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Michele FormanDepartment of Nutritional Sciences; University of Texas; Austin, TX USA.
Randy L JirtleDepartment of Oncology; McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Madison, WI USA.
Susan K MurphyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Gynecologic Oncology; School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Duke University · USIndiana University School of MedicineDuke Cancer InstituteCancer Institute (WIA) · INGynecologic Oncology Group · USUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Nutrition, Deregulation of Imprinted GenesR01ES016772 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HOYO, CATHRINE · 2009 to 2013
$3.1M
KCNK9 Imprinting in Breast Cancer Progression and MetastasisR01CA155664 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SEEWALDT, VICTORIA L. · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155664NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016772NIEHS NIH HHS R01-ES016772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic mechanisms are proposed to link maternal concentrations of methyl group donor nutrients with the risk of low birth weight. However, empirical data are lacking. We have examined the association between maternal folate and birth weight and assessed the mediating role of DNA methylation at nine differentially methylated regions (DMRs) of genomically imprinted genes in these associations. Compared with newborns of women with folate levels in the lowest quartile, birth weight was higher in newborns of mothers in the second (β = 143.2, se = 63.2, P = 0.02), third (β = 117.3, se = 64.0, P = 0.07), and fourth (β = 133.9, se = 65.2, P = 0.04) quartiles, consistent with a threshold effect. This pattern of association did not vary by race/ethnicity but was more apparent in newborns of non-obese women. DNA methylation at the PLAGL1, SGCE, DLK1/MEG3 and IGF2/H19 DMRs was associated with maternal folate levels and also birth weight, suggestive of threshold effects. MEG3 DMR methylation mediated the association between maternal folate levels and birth weight (P =0.06). While the small sample size and partial scope of examined DMRs limit our conclusions, our data suggest that, with respect to birth weight, no additional benefits may be derived from increased maternal folate concentrations, especially in non-obese women. These data also support epigenetic plasticity as a key mechanistic response to folate availability during early fetal development.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA MethylationGenomic ImprintingAdolescentAdultBirth WeightCohort StudiesEpigenesis, GeneticErythrocytesEthnicityFemaleFolic AcidHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyFolic Acidbirth weightDNA methylationepidemiologyepigeneticsfolateimprinted genes

Identifiers

PMID24874916
PMCPMC4164497
OpenAlexW2335704194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.