ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014
Evaluation of safety of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination during pregnancy: cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07257952 (An Observational Study on the Risk of Adverse Maternal and Infant Outcomes Associated With Respiratory Viral Infections Before and During Early Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observational Study on the Risk of Adverse Maternal and Infant Outcomes Associated With Respiratory Viral Infections Before and During Early Pregnancy
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Pooled it
- Adjuvanted-influenza vaccination in patients infected with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of immunogenicity and safety.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Pooled it
- The safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnancy for birth outcomes: a systematic review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Pooled it
- Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Guideline
- Guideline
- Trivalent influenza vaccination randomized control trial of pregnant women and adverse fetal outcomes.Vaccine · 2019Trial
- Evaluating the Protective Effects of Influenza Vaccination in Pregnant Women and Their Infants: An Umbrella Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Defining and reporting adverse events of special interest in comparative maternal vaccine studies: a systematic review.Vaccine: X · 2024Review
- Maternal Vaccination to Prevent Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Underutilized Molecular Immunological Intervention?Journal of molecular biology · 2023Review
- The risk of major structural birth defects associated with seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy: A population-based cohort study.Birth defects research · 2022Article
- Article
- Global Perspectives on Immunization During Pregnancy and Priorities for Future Research and Development: An International Consensus Statement.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- The Role of European Healthcare Databases for Post-Marketing Drug Effectiveness, Safety and Value Evaluation: Where Does Italy Stand?Drug safety · 2019Review
- Active surveillance for safety monitoring of seasonal influenza vaccines in Italy, 2015/2016 season.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Influenza immunization during pregnancy: Benefits for mother and infant.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the risk of maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes associated with the administration of an MF59 adjuvanted A/H1N1 vaccine during pregnancy.
designHistorical cohort study.
settingSingleton pregnancies of the resident population of the Lombardy region of Italy.
participantsAll deliveries between 1 October 2009 and 30 September 2010. Data on exposure to A/H1N1 pandemic vaccine, pregnancy, and birth outcomes were retrieved from regional databases. Vaccinated and non-vaccinated women were compared in a propensity score matched analysis to estimate risks of adverse outcomes.
main outcome measuresMain maternal outcomes included type of delivery, admission to intensive care unit, eclampsia, and gestational diabetes; fetal and neonatal outcomes included perinatal deaths, small for gestational age births, and congenital malformations.
resultsAmong the 86,171 eligible pregnancies, 6246 women were vaccinated (3615 (57.9%) in the third trimester and 2557 (40.9%) in the second trimester). No difference was observed in terms of spontaneous deliveries (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.08) or admissions to intensive care units (0.95, 0.47 to 1.88), whereas a limited increase in the prevalence of gestational diabetes (1.26, 1.04 to 1.53) and eclampsia (1.19, 1.04 to 1.39) was seen in vaccinated women. Rates of fetal and neonatal outcomes were similar in vaccinated and non-vaccinated women. A slight increase in congenital malformations, although not statistically significant, was present in the exposed cohort (1.14, 0.99 to 1.31).
conclusionsOur findings add relevant information about the safety of the MF59 adjuvanted A/H1N1 vaccine in pregnancy. Residual confounding may partly explain the increased risk of some maternal outcomes. Meta-analysis of published studies should be conducted to further clarify the risk of infrequent outcomes, such as specific congenital malformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.