Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24874834›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2014

CSPG4-specific immunity and survival prolongation in dogs with oral malignant melanoma immunized with human CSPG4 DNA.

Federica Riccardo, Selina Iussich, Lorella Maniscalco, Saray Lorda Mayayo, Giuseppe La Rosa, Maddalena Arigoni, Raffaella De Maria, Francesca Gattino, Stefania Lanzardo, Elena Lardone and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4: An attractive target for antibody-based immunotherapy.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica RiccardoAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino;
Selina IussichDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Lorella ManiscalcoDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Saray Lorda MayayoDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Giuseppe La RosaVeterinary practitioner; and.
Maddalena ArigoniAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino;
Raffaella De MariaDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Francesca GattinoDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Stefania LanzardoAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino;
Elena LardoneDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Marina MartanoDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Emanuela MorelloDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Simone PrestigioAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino;
Alessandra FioreAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino;
Elena QuaglinoAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino;
Sara ZabarinoDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy;
Soldano FerroneDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paolo BuraccoDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy; federica.cavallo@unito.it paolo.buracco@unito.it.
Federica CavalloAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino; federica.cavallo@unito.it paolo.buracco@unito.it.
University of Turin · ITAmerican Association of Nurse Practitioners · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Combinatorial targeting of melanoma initiating cellsR01CA138188 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FERRONE, SOLDANO · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDue to the many similarities with its human counterpart, canine malignant melanoma (cMM) is a valuable model in which to assess the efficacy of novel therapeutic strategies. The model is herein used to evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and therapeutic efficacy of a human chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan-4 (hCSPG4) DNA-based vaccine. The fact that homology between hCSPG4 and cCSPG4 amino-acidic sequences stands at more than 80% provides the rationale for using an hCSPG4 DNA vaccine in the cMM model. EXPERIMENTAL

designDogs with stage II-III surgically resected CSPG4-positive oral MM were subjected to monthly intramuscular plasmid administration, which was followed immediately by electroporation (electrovaccination) for at least 6, and up to 20, months. The immunogenicity, safety, and therapeutic efficacy of the vaccine have been evaluated.

resultshCSPG4 electrovaccination caused no clinically relevant local or systemic side effects and resulted in significantly longer overall and disease-free survival times in 14 vaccinated dogs as compared with 13 nonvaccinated controls. All vaccinated dogs developed antibodies against both hCSPG4 and cCSPG4. Seven vaccinated dogs were also tested for a cCSPG4-specific T-cell response and only two gave a detectable interferon (IFN)γ response.

conclusionXenogeneic electrovaccination against CSPG4 is able to overcome host unresponsiveness to the "self" antigen and seems to be effective in treating cMM, laying the foundation for its translation to a human clinical setting.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansDisease-Free SurvivalDog DiseasesDogsElectrochemotherapyFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMelanoma, ExperimentalMouth NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesChondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans

Identifiers

PMID24874834
PMCPMC8656093
OpenAlexW2117355140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.