Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24873841›Full record

ReviewClinics in perinatology2014

Human breast milk and the gastrointestinal innate immune system.

Brett M Jakaitis, Patricia W Denning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Oral colostrum priming shortens hospitalization without changing the immunomicrobial milieu.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Trial
  4. Exosome-like Nanovesicles fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brett M JakaitisDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, 2015 Uppergate Drive, 3rd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Patricia W DenningDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, 2015 Uppergate Drive, 3rd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: pllin@emory.edu.

Funding

Probiotics and Innate Intestinal DefenseR01HD059122 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DENNING, PATRICIA LANEE WEI · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a large potential portal for multiple infectious agents to enter the human body. The GI system performs multiple functions as part of the neonate's innate immune system, providing critical defense during a vulnerable period. Multiple mechanisms and actions are enhanced by the presence of human breast milk. Bioactive factors found in human milk work together to create and maintain an optimal and healthy environment, allowing the intestines to deliver ideal nutrition to the host and afford protection by a variety of mechanisms.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionImmunity, InnateGastrointestinal TractHumansInfant, NewbornMilk, HumanAntimicrobial peptidesBioactive factorsCommensal bacteriaHuman breast milkIntestinal microbiomeLactoferrinMucosal innate immune system

Identifiers

PMID24873841
PMCPMC4414019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.