ArticleJournal of mathematical neuroscience2014
Frequency Preference Response to Oscillatory Inputs in Two-dimensional Neural Models: A Geometric Approach to Subthreshold Amplitude and Phase Resonance.
Article in Journal of mathematical neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency-dependent coupling in response to oscillatory inputs in minimal networks of electrically coupled nodes: Gap junction networks and spatially extended neurons.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
- Spikes as perturbations of resonant neural circuits: an RLC framework with testable predictions.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Geometric constraints on the architecture of mammalian cortical connectomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A linearized modeling framework for the frequency selectivity in neurons postsynaptic to vibration receptors.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Frequency-domain analysis of membrane polarization in two-compartment model neurons with weak alternating electric fields.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Dynamics of interaction betweenCognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Simulations predict differing phase responses to excitation vs. inhibition in theta-resonant pyramidal neurons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Low-dimensional models of single neurons: a review.Biological cybernetics · 2023Review
- Oscillations and variability in neuronal systems: interplay of autonomous transient dynamics and fast deterministic fluctuations.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- The voltage and spiking responses of subthreshold resonant neurons to structured and fluctuating inputs: persistence and loss of resonance and variability.Biological cybernetics · 2022Review
- Diversity amongst human cortical pyramidal neurons revealed via their sag currents and frequency preferences.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Modeling Reveals Human-Rodent Differences in H-Current Kinetics Influencing Resonance in Cortical Layer 5 Neurons.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Frequency-dependent responses of neuronal models to oscillatory inputs in current versus voltage clamp.Biological cybernetics · 2019Article
- Membrane potential resonance in non-oscillatory neurons interacts with synaptic connectivity to produce network oscillations.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Resonance Properties in Auditory Brainstem Neurons.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Spiking resonances in models with the same slow resonant and fast amplifying currents but different subthreshold dynamic properties.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- Resonance modulation, annihilation and generation of anti-resonance and anti-phasonance in 3D neuronal systems: interplay of resonant and amplifying currents with slow dynamics.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- Mechanisms of generation of membrane potential resonance in a neuron with multiple resonant ionic currents.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- The shaping of intrinsic membrane potential oscillations: positive/negative feedback, ionic resonance/amplification, nonlinearities and time scales.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- High-Frequency Resonance in the Gerbil Medial Superior Olive.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate the dynamic mechanisms of generation of subthreshold and phase resonance in two-dimensional linear and linearized biophysical (conductance-based) models, and we extend our analysis to account for the effect of simple, but not necessarily weak, types of nonlinearities. Subthreshold resonance refers to the ability of neurons to exhibit a peak in their voltage amplitude response to oscillatory input currents at a preferred non-zero (resonant) frequency. Phase-resonance refers to the ability of neurons to exhibit a zero-phase (or zero-phase-shift) response to oscillatory input currents at a non-zero (phase-resonant) frequency. We adapt the classical phase-plane analysis approach to account for the dynamic effects of oscillatory inputs and develop a tool, the envelope-plane diagrams, that captures the role that conductances and time scales play in amplifying the voltage response at the resonant frequency band as compared to smaller and larger frequencies. We use envelope-plane diagrams in our analysis. We explain why the resonance phenomena do not necessarily arise from the presence of imaginary eigenvalues at rest, but rather they emerge from the interplay of the intrinsic and input time scales. We further explain why an increase in the time-scale separation causes an amplification of the voltage response in addition to shifting the resonant and phase-resonant frequencies. This is of fundamental importance for neural models since neurons typically exhibit a strong separation of time scales. We extend this approach to explain the effects of nonlinearities on both resonance and phase-resonance. We demonstrate that nonlinearities in the voltage equation cause amplifications of the voltage response and shifts in the resonant and phase-resonant frequencies that are not predicted by the corresponding linearized model. The differences between the nonlinear response and the linear prediction increase with increasing levels of the time scale separation between the voltage and the gating variable, and they almost disappear when both equations evolve at comparable rates. In contrast, voltage responses are almost insensitive to nonlinearities located in the gating variable equation. The method we develop provides a framework for the investigation of the preferred frequency responses in three-dimensional and nonlinear neuronal models as well as simple models of coupled neurons.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.