ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014
Nonlinear spatial integration in the receptive field surround of retinal ganglion cells.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling spatial contrast sensitivity in responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to natural movies.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Applying Super-Resolution and Tomography Concepts to Identify Receptive Field Subunits in the Retina.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Disparate nonlinear neural dynamics measured with different techniques in macaque and human V1.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diversity of Ganglion Cell Responses to Saccade-Like Image Shifts in the Primate Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Simple model for encoding natural images by retinal ganglion cells with nonlinear spatial integration.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Nonlinear Spatial Integration Underlies the Diversity of Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses to Natural Images.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Linear and nonlinear chromatic integration in the mouse retina.Nature communications · 2021Article
- What the salamander eye has been telling the vision scientist's brain.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
- Neural Circuit Inference from Function to Structure.Current biology : CB · 2017Article
- Three Small-Receptive-Field Ganglion Cells in the Mouse Retina Are Distinctly Tuned to Size, Speed, and Object Motion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Space-time codependence of retinal ganglion cells can be explained by novel and separable components of their receptive fields.Physiological reports · 2016Article
- Spike-Triggered Covariance Analysis Reveals Phenomenological Diversity of Contrast Adaptation in the Retina.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- High Accuracy Decoding of Dynamical Motion from a Large Retinal Population.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Throughout different sensory systems, individual neurons integrate incoming signals over their receptive fields. The characteristics of this signal integration are crucial determinants for the neurons' functions. For ganglion cells in the vertebrate retina, receptive fields are characterized by the well-known center-surround structure and, although several studies have addressed spatial integration in the receptive field center, little is known about how visual signals are integrated in the surround. Therefore, we set out here to characterize signal integration and to identify relevant nonlinearities in the receptive field surround of ganglion cells in the isolated salamander retina by recording spiking activity with extracellular electrodes under visual stimulation of the center and surround. To quantify nonlinearities of spatial integration independently of subsequent nonlinearities of spike generation, we applied the technique of iso-response measurements as follows: using closed-loop experiments, we searched for different stimulus patterns in the surround that all reduced the center-evoked spiking activity by the same amount. The identified iso-response stimuli revealed strongly nonlinear spatial integration in the receptive field surrounds of all recorded cells. Furthermore, cell types that had been shown previously to have different nonlinearities in receptive field centers showed similar surround nonlinearities but differed systematically in the adaptive characteristics of the surround. Finally, we found that there is an optimal spatial scale of surround suppression; suppression was most effective when surround stimulation was organized into subregions of several hundred micrometers in diameter, indicating that the surround is composed of subunits that have strong center-surround organization themselves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.