Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24872559›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Nonlinear spatial integration in the receptive field surround of retinal ganglion cells.

Daisuke Takeshita, Tim Gollisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diversity of Ganglion Cell Responses to Saccade-Like Image Shifts in the Primate Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nonlinear Spatial Integration Underlies the Diversity of Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses to Natural Images.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. What the salamander eye has been telling the vision scientist's brain.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Three Small-Receptive-Field Ganglion Cells in the Mouse Retina Are Distinctly Tuned to Size, Speed, and Object Motion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daisuke TakeshitaUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Ophthalmology, 37073 Göttingen, Germany, and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Tim GollischUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Ophthalmology, 37073 Göttingen, Germany, and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany tim.gollisch@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout different sensory systems, individual neurons integrate incoming signals over their receptive fields. The characteristics of this signal integration are crucial determinants for the neurons' functions. For ganglion cells in the vertebrate retina, receptive fields are characterized by the well-known center-surround structure and, although several studies have addressed spatial integration in the receptive field center, little is known about how visual signals are integrated in the surround. Therefore, we set out here to characterize signal integration and to identify relevant nonlinearities in the receptive field surround of ganglion cells in the isolated salamander retina by recording spiking activity with extracellular electrodes under visual stimulation of the center and surround. To quantify nonlinearities of spatial integration independently of subsequent nonlinearities of spike generation, we applied the technique of iso-response measurements as follows: using closed-loop experiments, we searched for different stimulus patterns in the surround that all reduced the center-evoked spiking activity by the same amount. The identified iso-response stimuli revealed strongly nonlinear spatial integration in the receptive field surrounds of all recorded cells. Furthermore, cell types that had been shown previously to have different nonlinearities in receptive field centers showed similar surround nonlinearities but differed systematically in the adaptive characteristics of the surround. Finally, we found that there is an optimal spatial scale of surround suppression; suppression was most effective when surround stimulation was organized into subregions of several hundred micrometers in diameter, indicating that the surround is composed of subunits that have strong center-surround organization themselves.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsAction PotentialsAmbystoma mexicanumAnimalsFemaleMalePhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual Fieldsclosed-loopganglion celliso-responsenonlinear modelreceptive field surroundretina

Identifiers

PMID24872559
PMCPMC6795248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.