Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24872556›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Motor inhibition affects the speed but not accuracy of aimed limb movements in an insect.

Delphine Calas-List, Anthony J Clare, Alexandra Komissarova, Thomas A Nielsen, Thomas Matheson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Motor control ofeLife · 2017
    Article
  4. Inhibitory motoneurons in arthropod motor control: organisation, function, evolution.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Delphine Calas-ListUniversity of Leicester, Department of Biology, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom, and.
Anthony J ClareUniversity of Leicester, Department of Biology, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom, and.
Alexandra KomissarovaDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom.
Thomas A NielsenUniversity of Leicester, Department of Biology, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom, and.
Thomas MathesonUniversity of Leicester, Department of Biology, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom, and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom tm75@le.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C005538/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I019065/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When reaching toward a target, human subjects use slower movements to achieve higher accuracy, and this can be accompanied by increased limb impedance (stiffness, viscosity) that stabilizes movements against motor noise and external perturbation. In arthropods, the activity of common inhibitory motor neurons influences limb impedance, so we hypothesized that this might provide a mechanism for speed and accuracy control of aimed movements in insects. We recorded simultaneously from excitatory leg motor neurons and from an identified common inhibitory motor neuron (CI1) in locusts that performed natural aimed scratching movements. We related limb movement kinematics to recorded motor activity and demonstrate that imposed alterations in the activity of CI1 influenced these kinematics. We manipulated the activity of CI1 by injecting depolarizing or hyperpolarizing current or killing the cell using laser photoablation. Naturally higher levels of inhibitory activity accompanied faster movements. Experimentally biasing the firing rate downward, or stopping firing completely, led to slower movements mediated by changes at several joints of the limb. Despite this, we found no effect on overall movement accuracy. We conclude that inhibitory modulation of joint stiffness has effects across most of the working range of the insect limb, with a pronounced effect on the overall velocity of natural movements independent of their accuracy. Passive joint forces that are greatest at extreme joint angles may enhance accuracy and are not affected by motor inhibition.

Indexed as

AnimalsExtremitiesFemaleGrasshoppersInsectaMotor ActivityMotor NeuronsMovementNeural InhibitionOrientationaccuracyaimed limb movementinhibitioninsectjoint stiffnessreaching

Identifiers

PMID24872556
PMCPMC4035516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.