Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24871614›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Developmental origins of pregnancy loss in the adult female common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus).

Julienne N Rutherford, Victoria A deMartelly, Donna G Layne Colon, Corinna N Ross, Suzette D Tardif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Census and genetic analysis of the United States marmoset population.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Non-human primate: the new frontier model of female reproductive engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julienne N RutherfordDepartment of Women, Children, and Family Health, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America; Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Victoria A deMartellyDepartment of Women, Children, and Family Health, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Donna G Layne ColonSouthwest National Primate Research Center/Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Corinna N RossSouthwest National Primate Research Center/Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America; Texas A & M University - San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America; Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, Barshop Institute for Longevity & Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Suzette D TardifDepartment of Cellular and Structural Biology, Barshop Institute for Longevity & Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

The Southwest National Primate Research Center Supplement- Infrastructure improvements of ABSL2 holding areasP51OD011133 · OD · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Larry S. Schlesinger · 2012 to 2026
$129.7M
WNV REPLIVAX VACCINE IN NON-HUMAN PRIMATESP51RR013986 · NCRR · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GOLDBERG, ERWIN · 1999 to 2011
$79.1M
UIC Program for Interdisciplinary Careers in Women's Health ResearchK12HD055892 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GELLER, STACIE E. · 2007 to 2016
$4.9M
Womb to womb: Programming reproductive development in the female marmoset monkeyR01HD076018 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RUTHERFORD, JULIENNE N · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
The Common Marmoset as a Primate Model of Maternal ObesityR01DK077639 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI POWER, MICHAEL L., TARDIF, SUZETTE D · 2006 to 2010
$1.2M
DETERMINANTS OF REPRODUCTIVE COMPETENCE IN TAMARINSR01RR002022 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI TARDIF, SUZETTE D · 1990 to 2003
$968k
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR013986NCRR NIH HHS P51-RR13986NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR002022NCRR NIH HHS R01-RR02022NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055892NICHD NIH HHS K12HD055892NICHD NIH HHS L50 HD077589NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076018NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD076018NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK077639NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK77639NIH HHS P51 OD011133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of the intrauterine environment on the developmental programming of adult female reproductive success is still poorly understood and potentially underestimated. Litter size variation in a nonhuman primate, the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus), allows us to model the effects of varying intrauterine environments (e.g. nutrient restriction, exposure to male womb-mates) on the risk of losing fetuses in adulthood. Our previous work has characterized the fetuses of triplet pregnancies as experiencing intrauterine nutritional restriction. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe used over a decade of demographic data from the Southwest National Primate Research Center common marmoset colony. We evaluated differences between twin and triplet females in the number of pregnancies they produce and the proportion of those pregnancies that ended in fetal loss. We found that triplet females produced the same number of total offspring as twin females, but lost offspring during pregnancy at a significantly higher rate than did twins (38% vs. 13%, p = 0.02). Regardless of their own birth weight or the sex ratio of the litter the experienced as fetuses, triplet females lost more fetuses than did twins. Females with a male littermate experienced a significant increase in the proportion of stillbirths. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These striking findings anchor pregnancy loss in the mother's own fetal environment and development, underscoring a "Womb to Womb" view of the lifecourse and the intergenerational consequences of development. This has important translational implications for understanding the large proportion of human stillbirths that are unexplained. Our findings provide strong evidence that a full understanding of mammalian life history and reproductive biology requires a developmental foundation.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryModels, BiologicalAbortion, SpontaneousAnimalsBirth WeightCallithrixFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetal Nutrition DisordersLitter SizePregnancyRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24871614
PMCPMC4037172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.