ArticleWorld journal of urology2014
Does HistoScanning™ predict positive results in prostate biopsy? A retrospective analysis of 1,188 sextants of the prostate.
Article in World journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of Histoscanning™ in prostate cancer diagnostics.World journal of urology · 2021Pooled it
- Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2015Pooled it
- Recent Advances in Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies.Research and reports in urology · 2021Review
- Prostate Imaging Compared to Transperineal Ultrasound-guided biopsy for significant prostate cancer Risk Evaluation (PICTURE): a prospective cohort validating study assessing Prostate HistoScanning.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2019Article
- Anatomic and Molecular Imaging in Prostate Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018Review
- Application of ultrasound imaging biomarkers (HistoScanning™) improves staging reliability of prostate biopsies.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- HistoScanningCurrent urology reports · 2017Review
- Ultrasound Elastography of the Prostate Using an Unconstrained Modulus Reconstruction Technique: A Pilot Clinical Study.Translational oncology · 2017Review
- True targeting-derived prostate biopsy: HistoScanning™ remained inadequate despite advanced technical efforts.World journal of urology · 2016Article
- Controversial evidence for the use of HistoScanning™ in the detection of prostate cancer.World journal of urology · 2015Review
- [Value of perineal HistoScanning™ template-guided prostate biopsy].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2015Article
- Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?BMC urology · 2015Article
- Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopic imaging for characterization of disease extent in prostate cancer patients.Translational oncology · 2015Article
- Multiparametric ultrasound of prostate: role in prostate cancer diagnosis.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe role of HistoScanning™ (HS) in prostate biopsy is still indeterminate. Existing literature is sparse and controversial. To provide more evidence according to that important clinical topic, we analyzed institutional data from the Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, Hamburg.
methodsPatients who received prostate biopsy and who also received HS were included in the study cohort. A single examiner, blinded to pathological results, re-analyzed all HS data in accordance with sextants of the prostate. Each sextant was considered as an individual case. Corresponding results from biopsy and HS were analyzed. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction of a positive biopsy by HS was calculated. Furthermore, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed according to different HS signal volume cutoffs (>0, >0.2 and >0.5 ml).
resultsOverall, 198 men were identified and 1,188 sextants were analyzed. The AUC to predict positive biopsy results by HS was 0.58. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for HS to predict positive biopsy results per sextant, depending on different HS signal volume cutoffs (>0, >0.2 and >0.5 ml) were 84.1, 27.7, 29.5 and 82.9 %, 60.9, 50.6, 28.8 and 79.7 %, and 40.1, 73.3, 33.1 and 78.8 %, respectively.
conclusionsPositive HS signals do not accurately predict positive prostate biopsy results according to sextant analysis. We cannot recommend a variation of well-established random biopsy patterns or reduction of biopsy cores in accordance with HS signals at the moment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24871425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.