ArticleAccounts of chemical research2014
Fast vibrational imaging of single cells and tissues by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.
Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal live-cell chemical imaging using coherent Raman scattering microscopy.The Analyst · 2026Review
- AI-Assisted Coherent Raman Scattering Microscopy for Clinical Translation.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- High-Content SRS Imaging Unveils Altered Cholesterol Metabolism in Ovarian Cancers Under CAR-T Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Advancing Label-Free Imaging Through CARS Microscopy: From Signal Formation to Biological Interpretation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Serendipitous Rise of Mid-infrared Photothermal Microscopy.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Advanced Imaging for Live-Cell Spatiotemporal Monitoring: Technologies and Applications.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Label-Free Longitudinal Imaging of Single Cell Drug Response with a 3D-Printed Cell Culture Platform.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Integrating nonlinear optical and Raman spectral imaging for label-free pathological examinations.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025Article
- Principle of Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy: Emerging at High Spatiotemporal Limits.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025Article
- Raman Spectroscopy in Cellular and Tissue Aging Research.Aging cell · 2025Review
- Label-free Raman imaging for screening of anti-inflammatory function food.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Vibrational imaging of metabolites for improved microbial cell strains.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Single-particle imaging of nanomedicine entering the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Raman cell sorting for single-cell research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- High-content stimulated Raman histology of human breast cancer.Theranostics · 2024Article
- Long-term cargo tracking reveals intricate trafficking through active cytoskeletal networks in the crowded cellular environment.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Coherent Raman scattering microscopy of lipid droplets in cells and tissues.Journal of Raman spectroscopy : JRS · 2023Article
- The Emerging Role of Raman Spectroscopy as an Omics Approach for Metabolic Profiling and Biomarker Detection toward Precision Medicine.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Eukaryotic Cell Membranes: Structure, Composition, Research Methods and Computational Modelling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Toward the Next Frontiers of Vibrational Bioimaging.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Traditionally, molecules are analyzed in a test tube. Taking biochemistry as an example, the majority of our knowledge about cellular content comes from analysis of fixed cells or tissue homogenates using tools such as immunoblotting and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. These tools can indicate the presence of molecules but do not provide information on their location or interaction with each other in real time, restricting our understanding of the functions of the molecule under study. For real-time imaging of labeled molecules in live cells, fluorescence microscopy is the tool of choice. Fluorescent labels, however, are too bulky for small molecules such as fatty acids, amino acids, and cholesterol. These challenges highlight a critical need for development of chemical imaging platforms that allow in situ or in vivo analysis of molecules. Vibrational spectroscopy based on spontaneous Raman scattering is widely used for label-free analysis of chemical content in cells and tissues. However, the Raman process is a weak effect, limiting its application for fast chemical imaging of a living system. With high imaging speed and 3D spatial resolution, coherent Raman scattering microscopy is enabling a new approach for real-time vibrational imaging of single cells in a living system. In most experiments, coherent Raman processes involve two excitation fields denoted as pump at ωp and Stokes at ωs. When the beating frequency between the pump and Stokes fields (ωp - ωs) is resonant with a Raman-active molecular vibration, four major coherent Raman scattering processes occur simultaneously, namely, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) at (ωp - ωs) + ωp, coherent Stokes Raman scattering (CSRS) at ωs - (ωp - ωs), stimulated Raman gain (SRG) at ωs, and stimulated Raman loss (SRL) at ωp. In SRG, the Stokes beam experiences a gain in intensity, whereas in SRL, the pump beam experiences a loss. Both SRG and SRL belong to stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), in which the energy difference between the pump and Stokes fields is transferred to the molecule for vibrational excitation. The SRS signal appears at the same wavelengths as the excitation fields and is commonly extracted through a phase-sensitive detection scheme. The detected intensity change because of a Raman transition is proportional to Im[χ(3)]IpIs, where χ(3) represents the third-order nonlinear susceptibility, Ip and Is stand for the intensity of the pump and Stokes fields. In this Account, we discuss the most recent advances in the technical development and enabling applications of SRS microscopy. Compared to CARS, the SRS contrast is free of nonresonant background. Moreover, the SRS intensity is linearly proportional to the density of target molecules in focus. For single-frequency imaging, an SRS microscope offers a speed that is ∼1000 times faster than a line-scan Raman microscope and 10,000 times faster than a point-scan Raman microscope. It is important to emphasize that SRS and spontaneous Raman scattering are complementary to each other. Spontaneous Raman spectroscopy covers the entire window of molecular vibrations, which allows extraction of subtleties via multivariate analysis. SRS offers the speed advantage by focusing on either a single Raman band or a defined spectral window of target molecules. Integrating single-frequency SRS imaging and spontaneous Raman spectroscopy on a single platform allows quantitative compositional analysis of objects inside single live cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.