Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24871212›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Detection and molecular characterization of Mycobacterium microti isolates in wild boar from northern Italy.

M Beatrice Boniotti, Alessandra Gaffuri, Daniela Gelmetti, Silvia Tagliabue, Mario Chiari, Anna Mangeli, Matteo Spisani, Claudia Nassuato, Lucia Gibelli, Cristina Sacchi and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Survey ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. InsideFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cytokines as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  7. Genomic comparison betweenFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Evaluation of the Presence and Viability ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  14. Stepwise pathogenic evolution ofScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Pathogenomic analyses ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  17. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  18. Infection byItalian journal of food safety · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M Beatrice BoniottiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy mariabeatrice.boniotti@izsler.it.
Alessandra GaffuriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
Daniela GelmettiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
Silvia TagliabueIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
Mario ChiariIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
Anna MangeliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
Matteo SpisaniAzienda Sanitaria Locale della Provincia di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Claudia NassuatoUnità Organizzativa Veterinaria, Direzione Generale Salute, Regione Lombardia, Piazza Città di Lombardia, Milan, Italy.
Lucia GibelliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
Cristina SacchiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
Mariagrazia ZanoniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
M Lodovica PacciariniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna: Centro Nazionale di Referenza per la Tubercolosi Bovina, Brescia, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · ITASL Roma · ITRegione Lombardia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 23,000 hunter-harvested wild boars from the pre-Alpine area of northern Italy were examined for tuberculosis over a 9-year period (2003 to 2011). Retropharyngeal and mandibular lymph nodes from the wild boars were examined grossly, and 1,151 of the lymph nodes were analyzed in our laboratory by histology (728 samples) and culture isolation (819 samples). Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC)-specific PCR (1,142 samples) was used for molecular-level detection in tissue samples, as was a gyrB restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay (322 samples). Lesions compatible with tuberculosis and indistinguishable from those described in cases of Mycobacterium bovis infection had been observed since 2003. Mycobacterium microti was identified directly in 256 tissue samples by the adopted molecular approaches. However, only 26 M. microti strains were obtained by culture isolation due to the well-known difficulties in isolating this slow-growing mycobacterium. During 2006, a prevalence study was performed in two provinces of the area, and the diffusion of M. microti was calculated to be 5.8% (95% confidence intervals surrounding the estimated prevalences [CIP95%], 3.94 to 7.68%). Over the following years (2007 to 2011), the presence of M. microti appeared to be stable. All isolates were genotyped by spoligotyping and exact tandem repeat analysis (ETR types A to F). In addition to the typical vole type (SB0118), a new spoligotype lacking the 43 spacers was found. Spoligotyping was also applied directly to tissue samples, and a geographical cluster distribution of the two spoligotypes was observed. This is the first report studying the diffusion and genetic variability of M. microti in wild boar.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenotypeItalyLymph NodesMolecular TypingMycobacteriumPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthPrevalenceSus scrofaTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID24871212
PMCPMC4136184
OpenAlexW2085769621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.