Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24869805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Attitudes of people in the UK with HIV who Are Antiretroviral (ART) Naïve to starting ART at high CD4 counts for potential health benefit or to prevent HIV transmission.

Alison J Rodger, Andrew Phillips, Andrew Speakman, Richard Gilson, Martin Fisher, Ed Wilkins, Jane Anderson, Margaret Johnson, Rebecca O'Connell, Simon Collins and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alison J RodgerUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew PhillipsUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew SpeakmanUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard GilsonUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Martin FisherBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Ed WilkinsPennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jane AndersonHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Margaret JohnsonRoyal Free NHS London Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca O'ConnellNewham University NHS Hospital Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Simon CollinsHIV i-Base, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan ElfordCity University London, London, United Kingdom.
Lorraine SherrUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona C LampeUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
ASTRA (Antiretrovirals, Sexual Transmission Risk and Attitudes) Study Group

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0608-10142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess if a strategy of early ART to prevent HIV transmission is acceptable to ART naïve people with HIV with high CD4 counts.

designASTRA is a UK multicentre, cross sectional study of 3258 HIV outpatients in 2011/12. A self-completed questionnaire collected sociodemographic, behavioral and health data, and attitudes to ART; CD4 count was recorded from clinical records.

methodsART naïve participants with CD4 ≥350 cells/µL (n = 281) were asked to agree/disagree/undecided with the statements (i) I would want to start treatment now if this would slightly reduce my risk of getting a serious illness, and (ii) I would want to start treatment now if this would make me less infectious to a sexual partner, even if there was no benefit to my own health.

resultsParticipants were 85% MSM, 76% white, 11% women. Of 281 participants, 49.5% and 45.2% agreed they would start ART for reasons (i) and (ii) respectively; 62.6% agreed with either (i) or (ii); 12.5% agreed with neither; 24.9% were uncertain. Factors independently associated (p<0.1) with agreement to (i) were: lower CD4, more recent HIV diagnosis, physical symptoms, not being depressed, greater financial hardship, and with agreement to (ii) were: being heterosexual, more recent HIV diagnosis, being sexually active.

conclusionsA strategy of starting ART at high CD4 counts is likely to be acceptable to the majority of HIV-diagnosed individuals. Almost half with CD4 >350 would start ART to reduce infectiousness, even if treatment did not benefit their own health. However a significant minority would not like to start ART either for modest health benefit or to reduce infectivity. Any change in approach to ART initiation must take account of individual preferences. Transmission models of potential benefit of early ART should consider that ART uptake may be lower than that seen with low CD4 counts.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAnti-Retroviral AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCross-Sectional StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID24869805
PMCPMC4037177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.