Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24869609›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2014

Intraoperative systemic lidocaine for pre-emptive analgesics in subtotal gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Jun H Yon, Geun J Choi, Hyun Kang, Joong-Min Park, Hoon S Yang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05153785 (Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Recovery in Liver Surgery, a Randomized Double Blinded Placebo-controlled Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05153785 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Recovery in Liver Surgery, a Randomized Double Blinded Placebo-controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLund University HospitalRan2021 to 2025Enrolled124ConditionsLiver Metastases, Liver Cancer, Postoperative Pain, Opioid UseArmsLidocaine, Normal saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Postoperative analgesic efficacy of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun H YonThe Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Geun J ChoiThe Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun KangThe Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Joong-Min ParkThe Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Hoon S YangThe Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Chung-Ang University · KRInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-emptive intravenous lidocaine infusion is known to improve postoperative pain in abdominal surgery. We assessed the effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion in patients who underwent subtotal gastrectomy.

methodsWe conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study with patients undergoing subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer divided into 2 groups: 1 group received intravenous lidocaine infusion preoperatively and throughout surgery, and the other received normal saline infusion (placebo). We assessed postoperative outcomes, including pain scores on a visual analogue scale (VAS), administration frequency of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and the amount of consumed fentanyl. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay (LOS), time to return to regular diet and patient satisfaction at discharge were evaluated.

resultsThere were 36 patients in our study. Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. The VAS pain scores and administration frequency of PCA were significantly lower in the lidocaine group until 24 hours after surgery, and fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in this group until 12 hours postoperatively compared with the placebo group. The total amount of consumed fentanyl and the total administration frequency of PCA were significantly lower in the lidocaine than the control group. No significant differences were detected in terms of nausea and vomiting, return to regular diet, LOS and patient satisfaction, and there were no reported side-effects of lidocaine.

conclusionIntravenous lidocaine infusion reduces pain during the postoperative period after subtotal gastrectomy.

Indexed as

GastrectomyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFentanylHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntention to Treat AnalysisIntraoperative CareLidocaineAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalFentanylLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID24869609
PMCPMC4035399
OpenAlexW2078392074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.