Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24868455›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2014

Vision related quality of life in patients with keratoconus.

Sevda Aydin Kurna, Ahmet Altun, Tugba Gencaga, Sezen Akkaya, Tomris Sengor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Factors Influencing Quality of Life in Keratoconus Patients Using the Keratoconus Outcomes Research Questionnaire (KORQ).Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Experiences of keratoconus patients attending public eye care facilities in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Quality of life of a sample of people with keratoconus in KSA.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sevda Aydin KurnaFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Training Hospital, Ophthalmology Clinics, Omerli Park 2 Sitesi No. 2, Kadirova Mevkii, Omerli, Cekmekoy, 34797 Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet AltunFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Training Hospital, Ophthalmology Clinics, Omerli Park 2 Sitesi No. 2, Kadirova Mevkii, Omerli, Cekmekoy, 34797 Istanbul, Turkey.
Tugba GencagaFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Training Hospital, Ophthalmology Clinics, Omerli Park 2 Sitesi No. 2, Kadirova Mevkii, Omerli, Cekmekoy, 34797 Istanbul, Turkey.
Sezen AkkayaFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Training Hospital, Ophthalmology Clinics, Omerli Park 2 Sitesi No. 2, Kadirova Mevkii, Omerli, Cekmekoy, 34797 Istanbul, Turkey.
Tomris SengorBilim University-Florence Nightingale Hospital, Ophthalmology Clinics, 34797 Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstanbul Bilim University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the vision related quality of life in patients with keratoconus by using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25). Methods. Thirty patients presented with keratoconus (keratoconus group) and 30 healthy patients (control group) were included in this study. Twenty patients were using rigid gas permeable and 10 patients were not using contact lenses in keratoconus group. High and low contrast visual acuity and mean K values of the patients were recorded. Each subject completed the 25-item NEI-VFQ-25. Results. All subscales of NEI-VFQ-25 were lower in the keratoconus patients. The difference was more evident in the subscales of general vision, ocular pain, near vision, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, and peripheral vision (P < 0.05). Overall composite score was 75.2 ± 17.2 in the keratoconus group and 93.2 ± 5.6 in the control group (P = 0.00). Contact lens wearers had higher best corrected visual acuity in comparison with noncontact lens wearers (P = 0.028). Patients with low visual acuity (logMAR > 0.4) in the better eye had lower distance vision, social functioning, mental health, and role difficulties. Meanwhile, patients with low visual acuity (logMAR > 0.4) in the worse eye had lower general health scores (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Vision related quality of life was worse in keratoconus patients. Success in the contact lens usage and maintaining higher visual acuity may improve vision related quality of life.

Identifiers

PMID24868455
PMCPMC4020211
OpenAlexW2039950682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.