Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24868065›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

Research into practice: acutely ill children.

Ann Van den Bruel, Matthew Thompson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Development of an observer-reported outcome measure to capture the signs and impact of fever distress symptoms in infants and young children.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ann Van den BruelNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Matthew ThompsonUniversity of Washington, Seattle, US, and senior researcher, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseBiomedical ResearchChildChild, PreschoolCommunicable DiseasesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedGeneral PractitionersHumansIncidencePrimary Health CarePrognosisRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID24868065
PMCPMC4032010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.