Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24867848›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2014

Biofeedback and behavioral treatments: filling some gaps.

Frank Andrasik, Licia Grazzi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank AndrasikDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, 400 Innovation Drive, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA, fndrasik@memphis.edu.
Licia Grazzi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofeedback and related behavioral approaches have been employed for decades in the management of recurrent headache conditions, with ample evidence to support their clinical utility. Initially, these treatments were employed entirely in the office and required an extended number of face-to-face sessions. Researchers have entered a new era wherein they are focusing on ways to make these treatments less intensive on the part of therapists, less expensive on the part of patients, more widely available and accessible, and retain their level of effectiveness. Initial efforts have focused on PLOT, group, internet, and mass media delivery approaches. This article discusses further approaches being explored to continue to extend behavioral treatment options for patients, focusing on alternative approaches for managing headaches, discussing the value of exercise, addressing depression and sleep problems more directly, and incorporating techniques of motivational interviewing. The importance, role, and value of patient education are stressed throughout.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyBiofeedback, PsychologyHeadacheHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.