Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24867697›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2014

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulval cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

C Meads, A J Sutton, A N Rosenthal, S Małysiak, M Kowalska, A Zapalska, E Rogozińska, P Baldwin, R Ganesan, E Borowiack and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer usingArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecological cancer: where do we stand?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
  8. Update on near infrared imaging technology: indocyanine green and near infrared technology in the treatment of gynecologic cancers.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. short review of current implementations of sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecologic cancersJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C MeadsCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
A J SuttonUnit of Health Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
A N RosenthalBarts Cancer Institute, London, UK.
S MałysiakArcana Institute, Kracow, Poland.
M KowalskaArcana Institute, Kracow, Poland.
A ZapalskaArcana Institute, Kracow, Poland.
E RogozińskaCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
P BaldwinAddenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
R GanesanPan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
E BorowiackBarts Cancer Institute, London, UK.
P BartonUnit of Health Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
T RobertsUnit of Health Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
K KhanCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
S SundarPan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy with technetium 99 (99mTc) and/or blue dye-enhanced lymphoscintigraphy in vulval cancer.

methodsSensitive searches of databases were performed upto October 2013. Studies with at least 75% of women with FIGO stage IB or II vulval cancer evaluating SLN biopsy with 99mTc, blue dye or both with reference standard of inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) or clinical follow-up were included. Meta-analyses were performed using Meta-Disc version 1.4.

resultsOf the 2950 references, 29 studies (1779 women) were included; most of them evaluated 99mTc combined with blue dye. Of these, 24 studies reported results for SLN followed by IFL, and 5 reported clinical follow-up only for SLN negatives. Pooling of all studies was inappropriate because of heterogeneity. Mean SLN detection rates were 94.0% for 99mTc, 68.7% for blue dye and 97.7% for both. SLN biopsy had pooled sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 92-98%) with negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% in studies using 99mTc/blue dye, ultrastaging and immunohistochemistry with IFL as reference. Pooled sensitivity for SLN with clinical follow-up for SLN-negatives was 91% (85-95%) with NPV 95.6%. Patients undergoing SLN biopsy experienced less morbidity than those undergoing IFL.

conclusionsSentinel lymph node biopsy using 99mTC, blue dye and ultrastaging with immunohistochemistry is highly accurate when restricted to carefully selected patients, within a rigorous protocol, with close follow-up and where sufficient numbers for learning curve optimisation exist. Patients must make an informed choice between the slightly higher groin recurrence rates of SLN biopsy vs the greater morbidity of IFL.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyColoring AgentsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesLymphoscintigraphyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiopharmaceuticalsStaining and LabelingTechnetiumVulvar NeoplasmsColoring AgentsRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium

Identifiers

PMID24867697
PMCPMC4056048
OpenAlexW2076107513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.