Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24867544›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2014

Introducing healing circles and talking circles into primary care.

Lewis Mehl-Madrona, Barbara Mainguy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Embedding equity and inclusion in universities through motivational theory and community-based conservation approaches.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lewis Mehl-MadronaDirector of Geriatric Education for Maine Dartmouth Family Medicine Residency in Augusta, ME, and is also affiliated with the Coyote Institute in Augusta, ME. mehlmadrona@gmail.com.
Barbara MainguyCreative Arts Therapist and Reiki practitioner. She is an Education Director at the Coyote Institute in Augusta, ME. artbarb@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on the incorporation of a North American aboriginal procedure called "the talking circle" into primary care in areas serving this population. Communication is regulated through the passing of a talking piece (an object of special meaning or symbolism to the circle facilitator, who is usually called the circle keeper). Twelve hundred people participated in talking circles in which 415 attended 4 sessions and completed pre- and postquestionnaires. Outcome measures included baseline and end Measure Your Medical Outcome Profile version 2 forms. Participation in at least 4 talking circles resulted in a statistically significant improvement in reported symptoms and overall quality of life (p < 0.001 and effect sizes ranging from 0.75 to 1.19). The talking circle is a useful tool to use with Native Americans. It may be useful as a means to reduce health care costs by providing other alternative settings to deal with stress-related and other life problems.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth Services, IndigenousIndians, North AmericanPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarrationOutcome Assessment, Health CareSaskatchewanStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID24867544
PMCPMC4022550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.