Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24867540›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2014

A phase 1/2 and biomarker study of preoperative short course chemoradiation with proton beam therapy and capecitabine followed by early surgery for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Theodore S Hong, David P Ryan, Darrell R Borger, Lawrence S Blaszkowsky, Beow Y Yeap, Marek Ancukiewicz, Vikram Deshpande, Shweta Shinagare, Jennifer Y Wo, Yves Boucher and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Particle therapy in gastrointestinal cancer-a narrative review.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Dose prescription and reporting in stereotactic body radiotherapy: A multi-institutional study.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Conditional Survival in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Theodore S HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: tshong1@partners.org.
David P RyanDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Darrell R BorgerDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lawrence S BlaszkowskyDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Beow Y YeapDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marek AncukiewiczDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vikram DeshpandeDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shweta ShinagareDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer Y WoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Yves BoucherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Raymond C WadlowDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eunice L KwakDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jill N AllenDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey W ClarkDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew X ZhuDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cristina R FerroneDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvey J MamonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Judith AdamsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Barbara WinrichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tarin GrilloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rakesh K JainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Thomas F DeLaneyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Carlos Fernandez-del CastilloDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dan G DudaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Vascular Normalization: Rolse of Perivascular CellsP01CA080124 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAIN, RAKESH K. · 2000 to 2016
$35.0M
Statistics, Data Exchange, Management and SupportP01CA021239 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DELANEY, THOMAS F · 1985 to 2013
$28.3M
Role of SDF1a pathway in prostate cancer relapse and metastasis post-radiotherapyR01CA159258 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DUDA, DAN GABRIEL · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
PROTON THERAPY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT CENTERC06CA059267 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GOITEIN, MICHAEL · 1992 to 1995
–
NCI NIH HHS C06 CA059267NCI NIH HHS C06-CA059267NCI NIH HHS P01 CA021239NCI NIH HHS P01-CA021239NCI NIH HHS P01 CA080124NCI NIH HHS P01-CA80124NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159258NCI NIH HHS R01-CA159258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the safety, efficacy and biomarkers of short-course proton beam radiation and capecitabine, followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy in a phase 1/2 study in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with radiographically resectable, biopsy-proven PDAC were treated with neoadjuvant short-course (2-week) proton-based radiation with capecitabine, followed by surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary objective was to demonstrate a rate of toxicity grade ≥ 3 of <20%. Exploratory biomarker studies were performed using surgical specimen tissues and peripheral blood.

resultsThe phase 2 dose was established at 5 daily doses of 5 GyE. Fifty patients were enrolled, of whom 35 patients were treated in the phase 2 portion. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities, and only 2 of 35 patients (4.1%) experienced a grade 3 toxicity event (chest wall pain grade 1, colitis grade 1). Of 48 patients eligible for analysis, 37 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Thirty of 37 (81%) had positive nodes. Locoregional failure occurred in 6 of 37 resected patients (16.2%), and distant recurrence occurred in 35 of 48 patients (72.9%). With median follow-up of 38 months, the median progression-free survival for the entire group was 10 months, and overall survival was 17 months. Biomarker studies showed significant associations between worse survival outcomes and the KRAS point mutation change from glycine to aspartic acid at position 12, stromal CXCR7 expression, and circulating biomarkers CEA, CA19-9, and HGF (all, P<.05).

conclusionsThis study met the primary endpoint by showing a rate of 4.1% grade 3 toxicity for neoadjuvant short-course proton-based chemoradiation. Treatment was associated with favorable local control. In exploratory analyses, KRAS(G12D) status and high CXCR7 expression and circulating CEA, CA19-9, and HGF levels were associated with poor survival.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCapecitabineCarcinoembryonic AntigenCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilGenes, rasHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansMaleACKR3 protein, humanAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCapecitabineCarcinoembryonic AntigenDeoxycytidineFluorouracilHepatocyte Growth FactorKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsReceptors, CXCR

Identifiers

PMID24867540
PMCPMC4791180
OpenAlexW2035281362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.