Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24866972›Full record

ArticlePsychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)2015

Computational psychotherapy research: scaling up the evaluation of patient-provider interactions.

Zac E Imel, Mark Steyvers, David C Atkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Scoping review on natural language processing applications in counselling and psychotherapy.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Individual-Specific Animated Profiles of Mental Health.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Client Distress From Session Recordings.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zac E ImelDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Utah.
Mark SteyversDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
David C AtkinsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.

Funding

Implementation of Technology-Based Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingR01AA018673 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES, NARAYANAN, SHRIKANTH · 2010 to 2020
$5.9M
Development and feasibility of computer based fidelity monitoring for MIR34DA034860 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI IMEL, ZACHARY E. · 2013 to 2015
$739k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018673NIAAA NIH HHS R01/AA018673NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA034860NIDA NIH HHS R34/DA034860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In psychotherapy, the patient-provider interaction contains the treatment's active ingredients. However, the technology for analyzing the content of this interaction has not fundamentally changed in decades, limiting both the scale and specificity of psychotherapy research. New methods are required to "scale up" to larger evaluation tasks and "drill down" into the raw linguistic data of patient-therapist interactions. In the current article, we demonstrate the utility of statistical text analysis models called topic models for discovering the underlying linguistic structure in psychotherapy. Topic models identify semantic themes (or topics) in a collection of documents (here, transcripts). We used topic models to summarize and visualize 1,553 psychotherapy and drug therapy (i.e., medication management) transcripts. Results showed that topic models identified clinically relevant content, including affective, relational, and intervention related topics. In addition, topic models learned to identify specific types of therapist statements associated with treatment-related codes (e.g., different treatment approaches, patient-therapist discussions about the therapeutic relationship). Visualizations of semantic similarity across sessions indicate that topic models identify content that discriminates between broad classes of therapy (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy vs. psychodynamic therapy). Finally, predictive modeling demonstrated that topic model-derived features can classify therapy type with a high degree of accuracy. Computational psychotherapy research has the potential to scale up the study of psychotherapy to thousands of sessions at a time. We conclude by discussing the implications of computational methods such as topic models for the future of psychotherapy research and practice.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapyResearchHumansLinguisticsSemantics

Identifiers

PMID24866972
PMCPMC4245387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.