Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24866763›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Integration of mRNA expression profile, copy number alterations, and microRNA expression levels in breast cancer to improve grade definition.

Claudia Cava, Gloria Bertoli, Marilena Ripamonti, Giancarlo Mauri, Italo Zoppis, Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa, Maria Carla Gilardi, Isabella Castiglioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia CavaInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy.
Gloria BertoliInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy.
Marilena RipamontiInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo MauriDepartment of Informatics, Systems and Communications, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Italo ZoppisDepartment of Informatics, Systems and Communications, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Pasquale Anthony Della RosaInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy.
Maria Carla GilardiInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy.
Isabella CastiglioniInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defining the aggressiveness and growth rate of a malignant cell population is a key step in the clinical approach to treating tumor disease. The correct grading of breast cancer (BC) is a fundamental part in determining the appropriate treatment. Biological variables can make it difficult to elucidate the mechanisms underlying BC development. To identify potential markers that can be used for BC classification, we analyzed mRNAs expression profiles, gene copy numbers, microRNAs expression and their association with tumor grade in BC microarray-derived datasets. From mRNA expression results, we found that grade 2 BC is most likely a mixture of grade 1 and grade 3 that have been misclassified, being described by the gene signature of either grade 1 or grade 3. We assessed the potential of the new approach of integrating mRNA expression profile, copy number alterations, and microRNA expression levels to select a limited number of genomic BC biomarkers. The combination of mRNA profile analysis and copy number data with microRNA expression levels led to the identification of two gene signatures of 42 and 4 altered genes (FOXM1, KPNA4, H2AFV and DDX19A) respectively, the latter obtained through a meta-analytical procedure. The 42-based gene signature identifies 4 classes of up- or down-regulated microRNAs (17 microRNAs) and of their 17 target mRNA, and the 4-based genes signature identified 4 microRNAs (Hsa-miR-320d, Hsa-miR-139-5p, Hsa-miR-567 and Hsa-let-7c). These results are discussed from a biological point of view with respect to pathological features of BC. Our identified mRNAs and microRNAs were validated as prognostic factors of BC disease progression, and could potentially facilitate the implementation of assays for laboratory validation, due to their reduced number.

Indexed as

Gene DosageGene Expression ProfilingBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasm GradingPrognosisRNA, MessengerBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24866763
PMCPMC4035288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.