Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24866538›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2014

Observation stays in administrative claims databases: underestimation of hospitalized cases.

Robert A Overman, Janet K Freburger, Magdalene M Assimon, Xiaojuan Li, M Alan Brookhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DXA Utilization Between 2006 and 2012 in Commercially Insured Younger Postmenopausal Women.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert A OvermanDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Janet K Freburger
Magdalene M Assimon
Xiaojuan Li
M Alan Brookhart

Funding

RENAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007750 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FALK, RONALD J · 1999 to 2022
$5.5M
Propensity Scores and Preventive Drug Use in the ElderlyR01AG023178 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STURMER, TIL · 2005 to 2014
$2.7M
A retrospective cohort study of the safety of testosterone therapy in older menR01AG042845 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BROOKHART, MAURICE ALAN · 2012 to 2013
$476k
Patterns of use, comparative effectiveness, and safety of rotavirus vaccinesR21HD080214 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BROOKHART, MAURICE ALAN · 2014 to 2015
$413k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG023178NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042845NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD080214NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent policy changes in the USA have led to an increasing number of patients being placed into observation units rather than admitted directly to the hospital. Studies of administrative data that use inpatient diagnosis codes to identify cohorts, outcomes, or covariates may be affected by this change in practice. To understand the potential impact of observation stays on research using administrative healthcare data, we examine the trends of observation stays, short (≤2 days) inpatient admissions, and all inpatient admissions.

methodsWe examined a large administrative claims database of commercially insured individuals in the USA between 2002 and 2011. Observation stays were defined on the basis of the procedure codes reimbursable by Medicare or commercial insurers. We report monthly rates of observation stays and short inpatient admissions overall and by patient demographics.

resultsWe identified 5 355 752 observation stays from 2002 to 2011. Over the course of study, the rate of observation stays increased, whereas the rate of short inpatient stays declined. The most common reason for observation stays was nonspecific chest pain, also the third most common reason for short inpatient stays. The increasing trend of observation stays related to circulatory diseases mirrors the decreasing trend of short inpatient stays.

conclusionsThe use of observation stays has increased in patients with commercial insurance. Failure to account for observation stays may lead to an under-ascertainment of hospitalizations in contemporary administrative healthcare data from the USA.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHospitalizationHospital UnitsHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleMedicareMiddle AgedTime FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adultadministrative claimsobservation stayspharmacoepidemiologyresearch methods

Identifiers

PMID24866538
PMCPMC4476545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.