Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24866500›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2014

Three commercial antibodies against α1-adrenergic receptor subtypes lack specificity in paraffin-embedded sections of murine tissues.

Tobias Böhmer, Norbert Pfeiffer, Adrian Gericke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. αPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current Developments on the Role of αFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias BöhmerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany, to.boehmer@t-online.de.
Norbert Pfeiffer
Adrian Gericke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the specificity of three commercially available antibodies (AB) against individual α1-adrenergic receptor subtypes (α1-ARST). We used these ABs to localize the α1-ARST proteins by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded murine tissues. The specificity of the ABs was tested by comparing staining patterns in tissues from wild-type mice with those in corresponding tissues from mice with gene-targeted disruption of the respective α1-ARST, one of the most rigorous negative controls. None of the tested ABs proved to be specific for the indicated target antigen. We conclude that the tested ABs are unsuitable for immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded murine tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntibody SpecificityCoronary VesselsImmunohistochemistryMaleMesenteric ArteriesMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutParaffin EmbeddingProtein SubunitsReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1Adra1a protein, mouseAdra1b protein, mouseAntibodiesProtein SubunitsReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.