ArticlePloS one2014
Cost of treatment in a US commercially insured, HIV-1-infected population.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Estimating HIV Management and Comorbidity Costs Among Aging HIV Patients in the United States: A Systematic Review.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Evaluating the Fiscal Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy for the Management of HIV in the United States 1987-2023.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness of HIV care coordination scale-up among persons at high risk for sub-optimal HIV care outcomes.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- Economic Outcomes of First-Line Regimen Switching Among Stable Patients with HIV.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2017Article
- A Population-Based Study of Care at the End of Life Among People With HIV in Ontario From 2010 to 2013.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2017Article
- Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Review
- Healthcare Coverage for HIV Provider Visits Before and After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Article
- HIV Prevention: The Key to Ending AIDS by 2030.The open AIDS journal · 2016Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Single- Versus Generic Multiple-Tablet Regimens for Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in the United States.PloS one · 2016Article
- Cost and safety of assisted reproductive technologies for human immunodeficiency virus-1 discordant couples.World journal of virology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRecent treatment patterns and cost data associated with HIV in the United States are limited. This study assessed first-line persistence and healthcare costs of HIV-1 in patients by treatment line and CD4 cell count.
methodsMarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (2007-2011) and Lab Database (2007-2010) were used to construct two HIV-1 cohorts: 1) newly treated HIV-1-infected patients with ≥6 months' continuous enrollment prior to first third-agent drug claim (Newly Treated Cohort) and 2) CD4 cell count test results (CD4 Measurements Cohort). All patients were ≥18 years old and without hepatitis co-infection. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure treatment switch rates. Generalized linear models (gamma distribution, log link) were used to compare healthcare costs by treatment line and CD4 cell count controlling for potential confounders.
resultsNewly treated patients (n = 8,617) had mean age of 41, 82% were male, and 20% had experienced AIDS-defining events at baseline. Over 20% of newly treated patients switched initial treatment regimen within 2 years. Average unadjusted (and covariate-adjusted) total healthcare cost/year was $33,674 ($28,861) for first-line, $39,191 ($35,805) for second-line, and $39,882 ($40,804) for third-line treatment. Covariate-adjusted costs of care on second- and third-line treatments were significantly more expensive than first-line treatment (24% [p<0.001] and 41% [p = 0.006] higher, respectively). The CD4 Measurements Cohort included 803 CD4 measurements (mean age 49, 76% male, 8% experienced an AIDS-defining event). Costs associated with CD4 measurements <100 cells/µL were 92% higher than those with >350 cells/µL (p<0.001). For higher CD4 cell counts, the majority of expenditures were for antiretrovirals (64% of total for CD4 >350 cells/µL).
conclusionsDespite modern advances in antiretroviral therapy and medical care, direct medical costs of HIV-1-infected patients increase after treatment switch and with lower CD4 counts, consistent with previous costing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.