Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24865450›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Individual and community level risk-factors for alcohol use disorder among conflict-affected persons in Georgia.

Bayard Roberts, Adrianna Murphy, Ivdity Chikovani, Nino Makhashvili, Vikram Patel, Martin McKee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bayard RobertsEuropean Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Adrianna MurphyEuropean Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ivdity ChikovaniCuratio International Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Nino MakhashviliGlobal Initiative on Psychiatry - Tbilisi, Georgia, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Vikram PatelCentre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Martin McKeeEuropean Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCuratio International Foundation · GEGlobal Initiative on Psychiatry · GEUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091834Wellcome Trust 093562/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence on alcohol use disorder among conflict-affected civilian populations remains extremely weak, despite a number of potential risk-factors. The aim of this study is to examine patterns of alcohol use disorder among conflict-affected persons in the Republic of Georgia.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 3600 randomly selected internally displaced persons (IDPs) and former IDPs. Two alcohol use disorder outcomes were measured: (i) having at least hazardous alcohol use (AUDIT score ≥ 8); (ii) episodic heavy drinking (consuming >60 grams of pure alcohol per drinking session at least once a week). Individual level demographic and socio-economic characteristics were also recorded, including mental disorders. Community level alcohol environment characteristics relating to alcohol availability, marketing and pricing were recorded in the respondents' communities and a factor analysis conducted to produce a summary alcohol environment factor score. Logistic regression analyses examined associations between individual and community level factors with the alcohol use disorder outcomes (among men only).

resultsOf the total sample, 71% of men and 16% of women were current drinkers. Of the current drinkers (N = 1386), 28% of men and 1% of women were classified as having at least hazardous alcohol use; and 12% of men and 2% of women as episodic heavy drinkers. Individual characteristics significantly associated with both outcomes were age and experiencing a serious injury, while cumulative trauma events and depression were also associated with having at least hazardous alcohol use. For the community level analysis, a one unit increase in the alcohol environment factor was associated with a 1.27 fold increase in episodic heavy drinking among men (no significant association with hazardous alcohol use).

conclusionThe findings suggest potential synergies for treatment responses for alcohol use disorder and depression among conflict-affected populations in Georgia, as well as the need for stronger alcohol control policies in Georgia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol-Related DisordersAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeorgia (Republic)Health SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsStress Disorders, Traumatic

Identifiers

PMID24865450
PMCPMC4035315
OpenAlexW2015207743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.