Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24865166›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014

Effect of intervention aimed at increasing physical activity, reducing sedentary behaviour, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children: active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) school based cluster randomised controlled trial.

Ruth R Kipping, Laura D Howe, Russell Jago, Rona Campbell, Sian Wells, Catherine R Chittleborough, Julie Mytton, Sian M Noble, Tim J Peters, Debbie A Lawlor

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 36 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 36 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 36 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Identifying effective intervention strategies to reduce children's screen time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruth R KippingSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Laura D HoweSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.
Russell JagoCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TZ, UK.
Rona CampbellSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Sian WellsSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Catherine R ChittleboroughSchool of Population Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Julie MyttonChildren and Young People's Services, Bristol City Council, Bristol BS1 5RT, UK.
Sian M NobleSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Tim J PetersSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8DZ, UK.
Debbie A LawlorSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK d.a.lawlor@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of Health 09/3005/04Medical Research Council G1002375Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/5Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1Wellcome Trust WT087640MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of a school based intervention to increase physical activity, reduce sedentary behaviour, and increase fruit and vegetable consumption in children.

designCluster randomised controlled trial.

setting60 primary schools in the south west of England.

participantsPrimary school children who were in school year 4 (age 8-9 years) at recruitment and baseline assessment, in year 5 during the intervention, and at the end of year 5 (age 9-10) at follow-up assessment.

interventionThe Active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) intervention consisted of teacher training, provision of lesson and child-parent interactive homework plans, all materials required for lessons and homework, and written materials for school newsletters and parents. The intervention was delivered when children were in school year 5 (age 9-10 years). Schools allocated to control received standard teaching.

main outcome measuresThe pre-specified primary outcomes were accelerometer assessed minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per day, accelerometer assessed minutes of sedentary behaviour per day, and reported daily consumption of servings of fruit and vegetables.

results60 schools with more than 2221 children were recruited; valid data were available for fruit and vegetable consumption for 2121 children, for accelerometer assessed physical activity and sedentary behaviour for 1252 children, and for secondary outcomes for between 1825 and 2212 children for the main analyses. None of the three primary outcomes differed between children in schools allocated to the AFLY5 intervention and those allocated to the control group. The difference in means comparing the intervention group with the control group was -1.35 (95% confidence interval -5.29 to 2.59) minutes per day for moderate to vigorous physical activity, -0.11 (-9.71 to 9.49) minutes per day for sedentary behaviour, and 0.08 (-0.12 to 0.28) servings per day for fruit and vegetable consumption. The intervention was effective for three out of nine of the secondary outcomes after multiple testing was taken into account: self reported time spent in screen viewing at the weekend (-21 (-37 to -4) minutes per day), self reported servings of snacks per day (-0.22 (-0.38 to -0.05)), and servings of high energy drinks per day (-0.26 (-0.43 to -0.10)) were all reduced. Results from a series of sensitivity analyses testing different assumptions about missing data and from per protocol analyses produced similar results.

conclusionThe findings suggest that the AFLY5 school based intervention is not effective at increasing levels of physical activity, decreasing sedentary behaviour, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in primary school children. Change in these activities may require more intensive behavioural interventions with children or upstream interventions at the family and societal level, as well as at the school environment level. These findings have relevance for researchers, policy makers, public health practitioners, and doctors who are involved in health promotion, policy making, and commissioning services. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50133740.

Indexed as

FruitMotor ActivitySchool Health ServicesVegetablesChildCluster AnalysisEnglandExerciseFeeding BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth PromotionHumansMaleObesitySchools

Identifiers

PMID24865166
PMCPMC4035503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.