Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24864268›Full record

ReviewJournal of immunology research2014

The pathology of T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Anselm Mak, Nien Yee Kow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immunology research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. mMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Methylation ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anselm MakDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 10, NUHS Tower Block, Singapore 119228 ; Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228.ORCID 0000-0002-4688-7829
Nien Yee KowDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-3172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by the production of a wide array of autoantibodies. Thus, the condition was traditionally classified as a "B-cell disease". Compelling evidence has however shown that without the assistance of the helper T lymphocytes, it is indeed difficult for the "helpless" B cells to become functional enough to trigger SLE-related inflammation. T cells have been recognized to be crucial in the pathogenicity of SLE through their capabilities to communicate with and offer enormous help to B cells for driving autoantibody production. Recently, a number of phenotypic and functional alterations which increase the propensity to trigger lupus-related inflammation have been identified in lupus T cells. Here, potential mechanisms involving alterations in T-cell receptor expressions, postreceptor downstream signalling, epigenetics, and oxidative stress which favour activation of lupus T cells will be discussed. Additionally, how regulatory CD4+, CD8+, and γδ T cells tune down lupus-related inflammation will be highlighted. Lastly, while currently available outcomes of clinical trials evaluating therapeutic agents which manipulate the T cells such as calcineurin inhibitors indicate that they are at least as efficacious and safe as conventional immunosuppressants in treating lupus glomerulonephritis, larger clinical trials are undoubtedly required to validate these as-yet favourable findings.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoantibodiesB-LymphocytesCalcineurin InhibitorsCell CommunicationClinical Trials as TopicGene Expression RegulationHumansImmunologic FactorsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMiceReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSignal TransductionT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAutoantibodiesCalcineurin InhibitorsImmunologic FactorsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID24864268
PMCPMC4017881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.