Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24864211›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pregnancy2014

Fetomaternal outcome in severe preeclamptic women undergoing emergency cesarean section under either general or spinal anesthesia.

Suman Chattopadhyay, Ashok Das, Subrata Pahari

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pregnancy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05558969 (The Effect of Prophylactic Magnesium Use in Pregnant Women on Reversal of Neuromuscular Block With Sugammadex), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05558969 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Prophylactic Magnesium Use in Pregnant Women on Reversal of Neuromuscular Block With Sugammadex:Evaluation With TOF

TypeinterventionalSponsorEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsMagnesium Sulfate, Pregnancy, Pre-Eclampsia, Neuromuscular BlockadeArmspregnant women taking magnesium, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suman ChattopadhyayDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical College & Hospital, 88 College Street, Kolkata 700073, India ; BC 103, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700064, India.
Ashok DasDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical College & Hospital, 88 College Street, Kolkata 700073, India.
Subrata PahariDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical College & Hospital, 88 College Street, Kolkata 700073, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective observational study compared the effects of general and spinal anesthesia in 173 severe preeclamptic women undergoing emergency cesarean section. 146 (84.5%) patients underwent spinal anesthesia (SA) and 27 (15.5%) patients had general anesthesia (GA). Most of the patients were primigravid and nulliparous. Intraoperatively SA group required more intravenous fluid and vasopressor support, while GA group required more preoperative labetalol injection for blood pressure control. Overall 13.3% of patients required critical care, particularly GA group (44.4% versus 7.5%; P < 0.001). Patients receiving GA had a higher mortality (25.9% versus 1.4%; P < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was comparable. Significantly more neonates of patients receiving GA were found to be preterm (77.8% versus 44.5%; P < 0.01) and required advanced resuscitation. GA group also had higher neonatal mortality (29.6% versus 11%; P < 0.05). To conclude, severe preeclamptic mothers receiving general anesthesia and their babies required more critical care support. Maternal as well as neonatal mortality was significantly higher with general anesthesia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, SpinalAnticonvulsantsAntihypertensive AgentsApgar ScoreCesarean SectionFemaleFetal MortalityGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLabetalolMagnesium SulfateAnticonvulsantsAntihypertensive AgentsLabetalolMagnesium SulfateMethyldopa

Identifiers

PMID24864211
PMCPMC4016895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.