Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24863635›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2014

Look inside Look AHEAD: why the glass is more than half-full.

Helmut Steinberg, Crystal Jacovino, Abbas E Kitabchi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helmut SteinbergDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 956 Court Ave, A202, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Crystal Jacovino
Abbas E Kitabchi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Look AHEAD is the only long-term study in a large cohort of subjects with type 2 diabetes that assessed the effect of intensive lifestyle, predominantly diet and exercise, on a number of outcomes. While Look AHEAD was not able to detect a significant effect of intensive lifestyle modification on cardiovascular outcomes, it clearly demonstrated numerous beneficial and sustained effects on health outcomes that are relevant to this population. Without the exceptional retention of study participants, it would have been difficult to detect these benefits. Our review provides a perspective on aspects related to exercise, diet, and weight loss in relation to cardiovascular outcomes and potential future research.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseHumansLife StyleWeight Loss

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.