Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24862581›Full record

ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2014

Ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation improves pulsatile arterial hemodynamics: a pilot trial.

Michael Pfob, Norbert Mürzl, Erich Müller, Bernd Eber, Thomas Weber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael PfobCardioVital Institute of Preventive and Rehabilitation Medicine, Grieskirchnerstraße 49, 4600, Wels, Austria, michael.pfob@medifit-wels.at.
Norbert Mürzl
Erich Müller
Bernd Eber
Thomas Weber
Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · ATBarmherzige Schwestern vom heiligen Kreuz · ATUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with coronary heart disease, both arterial stiffness and wave reflections are increased and predict unfavorable cardiovascular events. Cardiac rehabilitation has the goal to reduce risk factors and slow the progression of the disease. The aim of this study was to prospectively determine the impact of an ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation program on pulsatile hemodynamics.

methodsMale patients after coronary interventions, bypass surgery, or acute coronary syndromes underwent exercise and resistance training. Before and after the program, pulsatile hemodynamics was measured. Exercise capacity was assessed with an incremental cycle ergometer protocol. A detailed two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiogram was obtained for systolic and diastolic left ventricular function.

resultsA total of 27 men participated in the study. After the intervention (n = 24), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity decreased significantly from 8.7 (standard deviation (SD): 1.7) to 7.9 (SD: 1.9) m/s (p = 0.019), and augmentation index normalized for a heart rate of 75/min decreased significantly from 20.4 (SD: 8.7) to 17.5 (SD: 8.1; p = 0.017).

conclusionThe results suggest that a structured ambulatory rehabilitation program may improve pulsatile hemodynamics in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareExercise TherapyPulse Wave AnalysisResistance TrainingAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary Artery BypassCoronary DiseaseDisease ProgressionExercise TestHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID24862581
OpenAlexW2255182925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.