Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24862284›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2014

Competition as a way of life for H(+)-coupled antiporters.

Shimon Schuldiner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Energetic and structural control of polyspecificity in a multidrug transporter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Expression and mutagenesis studies in theFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The ins and outs of vesicular monoamine transporters.The Journal of general physiology · 2018
    Review
  16. A Loose Relationship: Incomplete HBiophysical journal · 2017
    Article
  17. Dissecting the proton transport pathway in electrogenic NaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Emulating proton-induced conformational changes in the vesicular monoamine transporter VMAT2 by mutagenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Simulating the Function of the MjNhaP1 Transporter.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shimon SchuldinerDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: shimon.schuldiner@huji.ac.il.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF ACTIVE NEUROTRANSMITTER TRANSPORTR01NS016708 · NINDS · HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM · PI KANNER, BARUCH I, SCHULDINER, SHIMON · 1985 to 2014
$3.0M
Mechanisms of Active Neurotransmitter TransportR56NS016708 · NINDS · HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM · PI KANNER, BARUCH I, SCHULDINER, SHIMON · 2009 to 2009
$306k
NINDS NIH HHS NS16708NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS016708NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS016708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiporters are ubiquitous membrane proteins that catalyze obligatory exchange between two or more substrates across a membrane in opposite directions. Some utilize proton electrochemical gradients generated by primary pumps by coupling the downhill movement of one or more protons to the movement of a substrate. Since the direction of the proton gradient usually favors proton movement toward the cytoplasm, their function results in removal of substrates other than protons from the cytoplasm, either into acidic intracellular compartments or out to the medium. H(+)-coupled antiporters play central roles in living organisms, for example, storage of neurotransmitter and other small molecules, resistance to antibiotics, homeostasis of ionic content and more. Biochemical and structural data support a general mechanism for H(+)-coupled antiporters whereby the substrate and the protons cannot bind simultaneously to the protein. In several cases, it was shown that the binding sites overlap, and therefore, there is a direct competition between the protons and the substrate. In others, the "competition" seems to be indirect and it is most likely achieved by allosteric mechanisms. The pKa of one or more carboxyls in the protein must be tuned appropriately in order to ensure the feasibility of such a mechanism. In this review, I discuss in detail the case of EmrE, a multidrug transporter from Escherichia coli and evaluate the information available for other H(+)-coupled antiporters.

Indexed as

Binding, CompetitiveAntiportersBinding SitesBiological TransportEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsProtonsAntiportersEmrE protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsProtonscoupling mechanismmembrane proteinsmultidrug transporterstransportvesicular neurotransmitter transporters

Identifiers

PMID24862284
PMCPMC4072998
OpenAlexW2112187549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.