Regenerative medicine: Selecting the right biological scaffold for tissue engineering.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. TNF-α, IL-1B and IL-6 affect the differentiation ability of dental pulp stem cells.BMC oral health · 2023
   Article
2. Using a Xenogeneic Acellular Dermal Matrix Membrane to Enhance the Reparability of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Cartilage Injury.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Article
3. Chitosan-Hydrogel Polymeric Scaffold Acts as an Independent Primary Inducer of Osteogenic Differentiation in Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
   Article
4. The cell-based approach in neurosurgery: ongoing trends and future perspectives.Heliyon · 2019
   Review
5. [Demineralized cancellous bone seeded with allogeneic chondrocytes for repairing articular osteochondral defects in rabbits].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2018
   Article
6. Double-Network Hydrogel with Tunable Mechanical Performance and Biocompatibility for the Fabrication of Stem Cells-Encapsulated Fibers and 3D Assemble.Scientific reports · 2016
   Article
7. Cell-based therapy technology classifications and translational challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Properties of biologic scaffolds and their response to mesenchymal stem cells.2014

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as