Live vs electronically delivered weight-loss interventions: paying for feasible interventions.

Tannaz Moin, Carol M Mangione

Abstract readComment

In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

3citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

Tele-Motivational Interviewing for Cancer Survivors: Feasibility, Preliminary Efficacy, and Lessons Learned.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2018
Trial
Diabetes Prevention Program Translation in the Veterans Health Administration.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017
Trial
Behavioral Treatment for Veterans with Obesity: 24-Month Weight Outcomes from the ASPIRE-VA Small Changes Randomized Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
Trial

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Comment on
A comparison of live counseling with a web-based lifestyle and medication intervention to reduce coronary heart disease risk: a randomized clinical trial.2014

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tannaz MoinHealth Services Research & Development Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California2David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los.

Carol M MangioneDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles3Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015

$57.0M

The Center for Health Improvement of Minority ElderlyP30AG021684 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CATHERINE A SARKISIAN · 2002 to 2026

$19.7M

NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000124NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021684NIA NIH HHS P30-AG021684

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Directive CounselingInternetRisk Reduction BehaviorCoronary DiseaseFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID24861172

DOI10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.414

PMCPMC4220444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.