Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24860813›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Early monitoring antiangiogenesis treatment response of Sunitinib in U87MG Tumor Xenograft by (18)F-FLT MicroPET/CT imaging.

Xiao Bao, Ming-Wei Wang, Yong-Ping Zhang, Ying-Jian Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cell-Proliferation Imaging for Monitoring Response to CDK4/6 Inhibition Combined with Endocrine-Therapy in Breast Cancer: Comparison of [Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  3. The Distribution Volume ofCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiao BaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China ; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4196-6691
Ming-Wei WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China ; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yong-Ping ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China ; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Ying-Jian ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China ; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China ; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIt was aimed to monitor early treatment response of Sunitinib in U87MG models mimicking glioblastoma multiforme by longitudinal (18)F-FLT microPET/CT imaging in this study.

methodsU87MG tumor mice were intragastrically injected with Sunitinib at a dose of 80 mg/kg for consecutive 7 days. (18)F-FLT microPET/CT scans were acquired on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 13 after therapy. Tumor sizes and body weight were measured. Tumor samples were collected for immunohistochemical analysis of proliferation and microvessel density (MVD) with anti-Ki67 and anti-CD31, respectively.

resultsThe uptake ratios of tumor to the contralateral muscle (T/M) of (18)F-FLT in the Sunitinib group decreased from baseline to day 3 (T/M0 = 2.98 ± 0.33; T/M3 = 2.23 ± 0.36; P < 0.001), reached the bottom on day 7 (T/M7 = 1.96 ± 0.35; P < 0.001), and then recovered on day 13. The T/M of (18)F-FLT uptake in the control group remained around 3.0. There was no difference for the tumor size between both groups until day 11. (18)F-FLT uptakes of tumor were correlated with Ki67 staining index and MVD.

conclusionEarly therapy response to Sunitinib could be predicted via (18)F-FLT PET, which will contribute to monitoring antiangiogenesis treatment.

Indexed as

DideoxynucleosidesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug MonitoringEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGlioblastomaIndolesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, NudeMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyalovudineAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsDideoxynucleosidesIndolesPyrrolesRadiopharmaceuticalsSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID24860813
PMCPMC4000939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.