ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2014
To be or not to be associated: power study of four statistical modeling approaches to identify parasite associations in cross-sectional studies.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The extent, nature, and pathogenic consequences of helminth polyparasitism in humans: A meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Pooled it
- Broad-spectrum molecular detection of zoonotic agents in wild micromammals: a nationwide surveillance study in the Republic of Korea.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in small ruminants in Franceville, Gabon.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2025Article
- Coinfection by multipleMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- A systematic review and guide for using multi-response statistical models in co-infection research.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Humans seropositive for Trypanosoma cruzi co-infected with intestinal helminths have higher infectiousness, parasitaemia and Th2-type response in the Argentine Chaco.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Coinfection frequency in water flea populations is a mere reflection of parasite diversity.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from the wild mountain ungulates mouflon and chamois in 4 regions of France.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2024Article
- Microbiome of Zoophytophagous Biological Control Agent Nesidiocoris tenuis.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Spatial and Temporal Circulation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Environmental and spatial determinants of enteric pathogen infection in rural Lao People's Democratic Republic: A cross-sectional study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Coinfections by noninteracting pathogens are not independent and require new tests of interaction.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- Article
- A three-years assessment of Ixodes ricinus-borne pathogens in a French peri-urban forest.Parasites & vectors · 2019Article
- Disentangling complex parasite interactions: Protection against cerebral malaria by one helminth species is jeopardized by co-infection with another.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Article
- Population genetics, community of parasites, and resistance to rodenticides in an urban brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) population.PloS one · 2017Article
- Multiple independent transmission cycles of a tick-borne pathogen within a local host community.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Tick-borne pathogens of zoonotic and veterinary importance in Nigerian cattle.Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
- Co-infection of Ticks: The Rule Rather Than the Exception.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A growing number of studies are reporting simultaneous infections by parasites in many different hosts. The detection of whether these parasites are significantly associated is important in medicine and epidemiology. Numerous approaches to detect associations are available, but only a few provide statistical tests. Furthermore, they generally test for an overall detection of association and do not identify which parasite is associated with which other one. Here, we developed a new approach, the association screening approach, to detect the overall and the detail of multi-parasite associations. We studied the power of this new approach and of three other known ones (i.e., the generalized chi-square, the network and the multinomial GLM approaches) to identify parasite associations either due to parasite interactions or to confounding factors. We applied these four approaches to detect associations within two populations of multi-infected hosts: (1) rodents infected with Bartonella sp., Babesia microti and Anaplasma phagocytophilum and (2) bovine population infected with Theileria sp. and Babesia sp. We found that the best power is obtained with the screening model and the generalized chi-square test. The differentiation between associations, which are due to confounding factors and parasite interactions was not possible. The screening approach significantly identified associations between Bartonella doshiae and B. microti, and between T. parva, T. mutans, and T. velifera. Thus, the screening approach was relevant to test the overall presence of parasite associations and identify the parasite combinations that are significantly over- or under-represented. Unraveling whether the associations are due to real biological interactions or confounding factors should be further investigated. Nevertheless, in the age of genomics and the advent of new technologies, it is a considerable asset to speed up researches focusing on the mechanisms driving interactions between parasites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.