Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24860781›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2014

Modeling platinum sensitive and resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer: development and applications of experimental systems.

Paula Cunnea, Euan A Stronach

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. NovelFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel glycolipid agents for killing cisplatin-resistant human epithelial ovarian cancer cells.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paula CunneaMolecular Therapeutics Laboratory, Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Cancer and Surgery , Imperial College London, London , UK.
Euan A StronachMolecular Therapeutics Laboratory, Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Cancer and Surgery , Imperial College London, London , UK.
Imperial College London · GBOvarian Cancer Action · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancer remains the most common sub-type of ovarian cancer and, characterized by high degrees of genomic instability and heterogeneity, is typified by a transition from early response to acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Conventional models for the study of ovarian cancer have been largely limited to a set of relatively poorly characterized immortalized cell lines and recent studies have called into question the validity of some of these as reliable models. Here, we review new approaches and models systems that take into account advances in our understanding of ovarian cancer biology and advances in the technology available for their generation and study. We discuss primary cell models, 2D, 3D, and organotypic models, and "paired" sample approaches that capture the evolution of chemotherapy failure within single cases. We also overview new methods for non-invasive collection of representative tumor material from blood samples. Adoption of such methods and models will improve the quality and clinical relevance of ovarian cancer research.

Indexed as

high-grade serous ovarian cancerplatinum sensitiveresistanttumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID24860781
PMCPMC4029026
OpenAlexW2147568127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.