Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24860666›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of family medicine2014

Long-Term Effect of Interactive Online Dietician Weight Loss Advice in General Practice (LIVA) Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Carl J Brandt, Vibeke Brandt, Mathilde Pedersen, Dorte Glintborg, Søren Toubro, Jesper Bo Nielsen, Gunther Eysenbach, Kirsten Brandt, Jens Søndergaard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of family medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Carl J BrandtResearch Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9A, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Vibeke BrandtResearch Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9A, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7317-8940
Mathilde PedersenResearch Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9A, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Dorte GlintborgDepartment of Endocrinology M, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 64, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Søren ToubroReduce - A Research Unit, Tempelvej 24, 4390 Vipperoed, Denmark.
Jesper Bo NielsenResearch Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9A, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Gunther EysenbachInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Canada M5T 3M.
Kirsten BrandtHuman Nutrition Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Food & Rural Development, Newcastle University, Agriculture Building, Kings Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9A, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKNewcastle University · GBOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Internet-based complex interventions aiming to promote weight loss and optimize healthy behaviors have attracted much attention. However, evidence for effect is lacking. Obesity is a growing problem, resulting in an increasing demand for cost efficient weight loss programs suitable for use on a large scale, for example, as part of standard primary care. In a previous pilot project by Brandt et al. (2011) without a control group, we examined the effects of online dietician counseling and found an average weight loss of 7.0 kg (95% CI: 4.6 to 9.3 kg) after 20 months. Aims and Methods. To analyze the effects of a complex intervention using trained dieticians in a general practice setting combined with internet-based interactive and personalized weight management support compared with conventional advice with a noninteractive internet support as placebo treatment in 340 overweight patients during a 2-year period. Primary endpoints are weight loss and lowering of cholesterol (LDL). We will also explore patients' sociodemographics and use of the intervention as well as the health professionals' views and perceptions of the intervention (their role and the advice and support that they provide). Perspective. The project will generate knowledge on the cost-effectiveness of a complex internet-based intervention in a general practice setting and on barriers and acceptability among professionals and patients.

Identifiers

PMID24860666
PMCPMC4016832
OpenAlexW2055163597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.