Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24860649›Full record

ReviewF1000prime reports2014

Surface-associated microbes continue to surprise us in their sophisticated strategies for assembling biofilm communities.

Daniel J Wozniak, Matthew R Parsek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000prime reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ThemBio · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Microbial Surface Colonization and Biofilm Development in Marine Environments.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Streptococcus mutans-derived extracellular matrix in cariogenic oral biofilms.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2015
    Review
  13. A molecular description of cellulose biosynthesis.Annual review of biochemistry · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel J WozniakDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, Department of Microbiology, Center for Microbial Interface Biology, The Ohio State University 460 W 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
Matthew R ParsekDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington 1705 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.

Funding

Biofilms and Immunity in Chronic WoundsR01NR013898 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K, WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Pseudomonas biofilms and immunityR01AI097511 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI097511NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms are rarely found in isolation. Frequently, they live as complex consortia or communities known as biofilms. The microbes within these complex structures are typically enmeshed in a matrix of macromolecules collectively known as the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). The last decade has seen enormous growth in the breadth and depth of biofilm-related research. An important area of focus has been the study of pure culture biofilms of different model species. This work has informed us about the different genetic determinants involved in biofilm formation and the environmental conditions that influence the process. These studies have also highlighted both species-specific aspects of biofilm development and common trends observed across many different organisms. This report highlights some exciting findings in recent biofilm-related research.

Identifiers

PMID24860649
PMCPMC4018179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.