Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24860522›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014

Do ambient urban odors evoke basic emotions?

Sandra T Glass, Elisabeth Lingg, Eva Heuberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Testing a New Protocol of Nature-Based Intervention to Enhance Well-Being: A Randomized Control Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Reactive indoor air chemistry and health-A workshop summary.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2017
    Review
  15. A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Applied olfactory cognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandra T GlassDivision of Clinical Pharmacy and Diagnostics, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria ; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Elisabeth LinggDivision of Clinical Pharmacy and Diagnostics, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
Eva HeubergerDivision of Clinical Pharmacy and Diagnostics, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria ; Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Saarland University Saarbruecken, Germany ; Pharmaceutical Biology, Department of Pharmacy, Saarland University Saarbruecken, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragrances, such as plant odors, have been shown to evoke autonomic response patterns associated with Ekman's (Ekman et al., 1983) basic emotions happiness, surprise, anger, fear, sadness, and disgust. Inducing positive emotions by odors in highly frequented public spaces could serve to improve the quality of life in urban environments. Thus, the present study evaluated the potency of ambient odors connoted with an urban environment to evoke basic emotions on an autonomic and cognitive response level. Synthetic mixtures representing the odors of disinfectant, candles/bees wax, summer air, burnt smell, vomit and musty smell as well as odorless water as a control were presented five times in random order to 30 healthy, non-smoking human subjects with intact sense of smell. Skin temperature, skin conductance, breathing rate, forearm muscle activity, blink rate, and heart rate were recorded simultaneously. Subjects rated the odors in terms of pleasantness, intensity and familiarity and gave verbal labels to each odor as well as cognitive associations with the basic emotions. The results showed that the amplitude of the skin conductance response (SCR) varied as a function of odor presentation. Burnt smell and vomit elicited significantly higher electrodermal responses than summer air. Also, a negative correlation was revealed between the amplitude of the SCR and hedonic odor valence indicating that the magnitude of the electrodermal response increased with odor unpleasantness. The analysis of the cognitive associations between odors and basic emotions showed that candles/bees wax and summer air were specifically associated with happiness whereas burnt smell and vomit were uniquely associated with disgust. Our findings suggest that city odors may evoke specific cognitive associations of basic emotions and that autonomic activity elicited by such odors is related to odor hedonics.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systembasic emotionscity odorshedonic valenceodor intensity

Identifiers

PMID24860522
PMCPMC4017720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.