Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24860468›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

The affordance-matching hypothesis: how objects guide action understanding and prediction.

Patric Bach, Toby Nicholson, Matthew Hudson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Representation of Observed Actions at the Subordinate, Basic, and Superordinate Level.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Six dimensions describe action understanding: The ACT-FASTaxonomy.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Influence of On-Sight and Flash Climbing Styles on Advanced Climbers' Route Completion for Bouldering.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Affordance matching predictively shapes the perceptual representation of others' ongoing actions.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patric BachSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus Devon, UK.
Toby NicholsonSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus Devon, UK.
Matthew HudsonSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus Devon, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action understanding lies at the heart of social interaction. Prior research has often conceptualized this capacity in terms of a motoric matching of observed actions to an action in one's motor repertoire, but has ignored the role of object information. In this manuscript, we set out an alternative conception of intention understanding, which places the role of objects as central to our observation and comprehension of the actions of others. We outline the current understanding of the interconnectedness of action and object knowledge, demonstrating how both rely heavily on the other. We then propose a novel framework, the affordance-matching hypothesis, which incorporates these findings into a simple model of action understanding, in which object knowledge-what an object is for and how it is used-can inform and constrain both action interpretation and prediction. We will review recent empirical evidence that supports such an object-based view of action understanding and we relate the affordance matching hypothesis to recent proposals that have re-conceptualized the role of mirror neurons in action understanding.

Indexed as

action predictionaction understandingaffordancesobject functionobject manipulation

Identifiers

PMID24860468
PMCPMC4026748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.