Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24860260›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2014

A characterization of clinical questions asked by rehabilitation therapists.

Lorie Andrea Kloda, Joan C Bartlett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorie Andrea Klodalorie.kloda@mcgill.ca Associate Librarian, McGill University Library, McLennan Library Building, 3459 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC H3A 0C9, Canada; joan.bartlett@mcgill.ca Associate Professor, McGill University School of Information Studies, 3661 Peel Street, Montreal, QC H3A 1X1, Canada.
Joan C Bartlettlorie.kloda@mcgill.ca Associate Librarian, McGill University Library, McLennan Library Building, 3459 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC H3A 0C9, Canada; joan.bartlett@mcgill.ca Associate Professor, McGill University School of Information Studies, 3661 Peel Street, Montreal, QC H3A 1X1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explored the information needs of rehabilitation therapists (occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists) working with patients who have had strokes in order to characterize their clinical questions, defined as their formalized information needs arising in the context of everyday clinical practice.

methodsThe researchers took a constructivist, interpretive approach, in which fifteen rehabilitation therapists working in various settings were recruited. Data were gathered using diaries, followed by diary-guided interviews, and thematically analyzed using template analysis.

resultsRehabilitation therapists' clinical questions were characterized as having one or more of twelve foci and containing one or more of eight possible structural elements.

conclusionsFindings demonstrate that the evidence-based practice framework currently applied for questions relating to rehabilitation is inadequate for representing rehabilitation therapists' clinical questions. A new framework that is more comprehensive and descriptive is proposed. IMPLICATIONS: Librarians working with students and clinicians in rehabilitation can employ knowledge of the twelve foci and the question structure for rehabilitation to guide the reference interview. Instruction on question formulation in evidence-based practice can employ the revised structure for rehabilitation, offering students and clinicians an alternative to the traditional patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) structure. Information products, including bibliographic databases and synopsis services, can tailor their interfaces according to question foci and prompt users to enter search terms corresponding to any of the eight possible elements found in rehabilitation therapists' clinical questions.

Indexed as

Allied Health OccupationsEvidence-Based PracticeInformation Seeking BehaviorNeeds AssessmentHumansInterviews as TopicMental ProcessesQuebec

Identifiers

PMID24860260
PMCPMC3988776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.