ArticleNeuro-oncology2014
Predicting the likelihood of an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 mutation in diagnoses of infiltrative glioma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of neuropathology in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Classification of histology and molecular subtypes of brain gliomas and glioneuronal and neuronal tumors using a deep learning approach.European radiology · 2026Article
- The Clinical Role of miRNAs in the Development and Treatment of Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Potential Utility of RAS Q61R Immunohistochemistry as a Screening Tool in Pre-operative Fine Needle Aspirates of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.Endocrine pathology · 2024Article
- Evaluating the prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammatory index in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Molecular GBM versus Histopathological GBM: Radiology-Pathology-Genetic Correlation and the New WHO 2021 Definition of Glioblastoma.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in the analysis of histopathology images of gliomas: a review.Npj imaging · 2024Review
- Article
- Molecular neuropathology: an essential and evolving toolbox for the diagnosis and clinical management of central nervous system tumors.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Review
- Radiogenomics of adult intracranial gliomas after the 2021 World Health Organisation classification: a review of changes, challenges and opportunities.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Review
- Long-term survival in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma: clinical and molecular characteristics.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Characterization of an IDH1 R132H Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody, MRQ-67, and Its Applications in the Identification of Diffuse Gliomas.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Swin Transformer Improves the IDH Mutation Status Prediction of Gliomas Free of MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Improving the noninvasive classification of glioma genetic subtype with deep learning and diffusion-weighted imaging.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in glioma researches: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Clinical implications of molecular analysis in diffuse glioma stratification.Brain tumor pathology · 2021Article
- Clinical and Genetic Features of Brainstem Glioma in Adults: A Report of 50 Cases in a Single Center.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Article
- Non-Invasive Prediction ofCancers · 2020Article
- Neuro-Oncology and Radiogenomics: Time to Integrate?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Review
- Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status prediction in histopathology images of gliomas using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral variables are associated with the likelihood of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) mutation in gliomas, though no guidelines yet exist for when testing is warranted, especially when an R132H IDH1 immunostain is negative.
methodsA cohort of 89 patients was used to build IDH1/2 mutation prediction models in World Health Organization grades II-IV gliomas, and an external cohort of 100 patients was used for validation. Logistic regression and backward model selection with the Akaike information criterion were used to develop prediction models.
resultsA multivariable model, incorporating patient age, glioblastoma multiforme diagnosis, and prior history of grade II or III glioma, was developed to predict IDH1/2 mutation probability. This model generated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.934 (95% CI: 0.878, 0.978) in the external validation cohort and 0.941 (95% CI: 0.918, 0.962) in the cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas. When R132H IDH1 immunostain information was added, AUC increased to 0.986 (95% CI: 0.967, 0.998). This model had an AUC of 0.947 (95% CI: 0.891, 0.995) in predicting whether an R132H IDH1 immunonegative case harbored a less common IDH1 or IDH2 mutation. The models were also 94% accurate in predicting IDH1/2 mutation status in gliomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas. An interactive web-based application for calculating the probability of an IDH1/2 mutation is now available using these models.
conclusionsWe have integrated multiple variables to generate a probability of an IDH1/2 mutation. The associated web-based application can help triage diffuse gliomas that would benefit from mutation testing in both clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.