Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24860000›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2014

Which features of primary care affect unscheduled secondary care use? A systematic review.

Alyson Huntley, Daniel Lasserson, Lesley Wye, Richard Morris, Kath Checkland, Helen England, Chris Salisbury, Sarah Purdy

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. What helps or hinders the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Income-related inequalities in ACSC hospitalization in Canada: evidence from 2005-2019 surveys linked with hospitalization and tax data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alyson HuntleySchool of Community & Social Medicine, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Daniel LassersonDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lesley WyeSchool of Community & Social Medicine, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Richard MorrisPrimary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, London, UK.
Kath ChecklandInstitute of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Helen EnglandSchool of Community & Social Medicine, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris SalisburySchool of Community & Social Medicine, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sarah PurdySchool of Community & Social Medicine, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1111-26018Department of Health PB-PG-1208-18013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct a systematic review to identify studies that describe factors and interventions at primary care practice level that impact on levels of utilisation of unscheduled secondary care.

settingObservational studies at primary care practice level.

participantsStudies included people of any age of either sex living in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries with any health condition. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was unscheduled secondary care as measured by emergency department attendance and emergency hospital admissions.

results48 papers were identified describing potential influencing features on emergency department visits (n=24 studies) and emergency admissions (n=22 studies). Patient factors associated with both outcomes were increased age, reduced socioeconomic status, lower educational attainment, chronic disease and multimorbidity. Features of primary care affecting unscheduled secondary care were more complex. Being able to see the same healthcare professional reduced unscheduled secondary care. Generally, better access was associated with reduced unscheduled care in the USA. Proximity to healthcare provision influenced patterns of use. Evidence relating to quality of care was limited and mixed.

conclusionsThe majority of research was from different healthcare systems and limited in the extent to which it can inform policy. However, there is evidence that continuity of care is associated with reduced emergency department attendance and emergency hospital admissions.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareEmergency Medical ServicesHospitalizationHumansSecondary Health CareAccident & Emergency MedicinePrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID24860000
PMCPMC4039790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.