ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2014
Distribution of 13 virulence genes among clinical and environmental Aeromonas spp. in Western Australia.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of pathogenic bacteria in retailed shrimp from Bangladesh.Food science & nutrition · 2024Article
- Intestinal pathogens detected in cockroach species within different food-related environment in Pudong, China.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Isolation, identification and characteristics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Isolation, genetic characterization, and virulence profiling of differentVeterinary world · 2023Article
- Epidemiology ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Potential Pathogenicity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- First Record of the Rare SpeciesPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection of Virulence-Associated Genes andFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Prevalence and genetic diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Recent Insights intoJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Comparative and Evolutionary Genomics of Isolates Provide Insight into the Pathoadaptation of Aeromonas.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Wild Nutria (Microorganisms · 2019Article
- Classification of Aeromonas spp. isolated from water and clinical sources and distribution of virulence genes.Folia microbiologica · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the pathogenic potential of 98 clinical and 31 environmental Aeromonas isolates by detecting the presence of 13 virulence genes using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method. The majority (96 %) of the strains contained at least one of the virulence genes. The overall distribution was aerA/haem (77 %), alt (53 %), lafA (51 %), ast (39 %), flaA (32 %), aspA (29 %), vasH (26 %), ascV (16 %) and aexT (13 %). No amplification products were detected for the genes encoding a bundle-forming pilus (BfpA and BfpG) or a Shiga-like toxin (stx-1 and stx-2). Five or more virulence genes were detected in 42 % of environmental and 24 % of clinical isolates. Among the major species, 48 % of A. hydrophila and 42 % of A. dhakensis isolates harboured five or more virulence genes compared with 19 % in A. veronii bv. sobria and none in A. caviae isolates. Our results suggest that, in Western Australia, strains of A. dhakensis and A. hydrophila are potentially more virulent than those of A. veronii bv. sobria and A. caviae, although the pathogenic potential of Aeromonas spp. is probably strain- rather than species-dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24859908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.