Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24859897›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2014

Trends in epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of proximal humeral fractures.

Christian Bahrs, Tanja Stojicevic, Stojicevic Tanja, Gunnar Blumenstock, Blumenstock Gunnar, Stig Brorson, Brorson Stig, Andreas Badke, Ulrich Stöckle, Stöckle Ulrich and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Risk factors for intra-articular involvement in proximal humeral fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Tanja, Stojicevic [corrected to Stojicevic, Tanja]; Gunnar, Blumenstock [corrected to Blumenstock, Gunnar]; Stig, Brorson [corrected to Brorson, Stig]; Ulrich, Stöckle [corrected to Stöckle, Ulrich]; Bernd, Rolauffs [corrected to Rolauffs, Bernd]; Thomas
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian BahrsClinic for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr, 95, 72074, Tübingen, Germany, C.Bahrs@gmx.de.
Tanja Stojicevic
Stojicevic Tanja
Gunnar Blumenstock
Blumenstock Gunnar
Stig Brorson
Brorson Stig
Andreas Badke
Ulrich Stöckle
Stöckle Ulrich
Bernd Rolauffs
Rolauffs Bernd
Thomas Freude
Freude Thomas
University of Tübingen · DEBG Klinik Tübingen · DEHerlev Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProximal humeral fractures are common and frequently associated with osteoporosis. Little is known about the association between the patho-anatomical fracture pattern of proximal humeral fractures and patient characteristics. The purpose of this six year longitudinal registry analysis of proximal humeral fractures was to study overall numbers, certain predefined pathoanatomical patterns and distribution compared with specific patient characteristics.

methodsData of patients treated between 2006 and 2011 in a country hospital that provides care >95 % of the city's hospitalised patients with fractures was retrospectively reviewed. Data were analysed according to patient characteristics of age, gender, comorbidity, accompanying injuries and radiological analysis of pathoanatomical fracture patterns based on Neer and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification.

resultsEight hundred and fifteen proximal humeral fractures (67% women/33% men; mean age 66 years, range 19-99) were analysed. During the study period, an overall increase of 42.5% was found: according to AO classification, 46% were type A, 22% type B and 32% type C. Based on the Neer classification, 86% were displaced, and 49% were complex with more than three parts. Of complex fractures, 57% were female patients >60 years. The number of complex fractures was five times higher in women >60 years than in men of the same age group.

conclusionsAn overall increase of inpatients with displaced proximal tibial fractures was documented. Interestingly, complex displaced proximal humeral fractures, especially in older women with comorbidities, accounted for the majority of cases. These results suggest that health-care planning and hospital-based therapeutic strategies should focus on this patient group.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsShoulder Fractures

Identifiers

PMID24859897
PMCPMC4115093
OpenAlexW2013903809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.