Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24859876›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2014

Outcomes of first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 17p deletion.

Paolo Strati, Michael J Keating, Susan M O'Brien, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Jan Burger, Stefan Faderl, Francesco Paolo Tambaro, Nitin Jain, William G Wierda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Is There a Role for Chemotherapy in the Era of Targeted Therapies?Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020
    Review
  14. Promises and pitfalls of targeted agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Selecting Frontline Therapy for CLL in 2018.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paolo StratiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
Michael J KeatingDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
Susan M O'BrienDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
Alessandra FerrajoliDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
Jan BurgerDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
Stefan FaderlDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
Francesco Paolo TambaroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
Nitin JainDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
William G WierdaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA wwierda@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although uncommon in treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, deletion 17p is a high-risk disease characteristic. We analyzed and reported outcomes for 63 patients with deletion 17p chronic lymphocytic leukemia who received first-line therapy at our institution; at time of first treatment, 81% had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene and 58% had complex karyotype. Forty-nine patients (76%) received first-line fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab-based therapy, 6 (11%) received rituximab-based and 8 (13%) received lenalidomide-based treatment. Overall, the complete plus nodular partial remission rate was 33%; on multivariable model, higher complete plus nodular partial remission rate was observed in patients with less than 50% cells positive for deletion 17p, and a higher probability of achieving at least a partial remission was observed with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab-based treatment. After a median follow up of 33 months (range 1-89 months), the estimated median progression-free survival was 14 months (95% confidence interval 10-18) and estimated median overall survival was 63 months (95% confidence interval 43-83). In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with longer progression-free survival were response to treatment and absence of complex karyotype. Achievement of complete plus nodular partial remission rate and mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene were independently associated with longer overall survival in multivariable model. Complex karyotype was associated with increased risk for Richter's transformation. New first-line strategies and agents must aim at both improving response and maintaining remission in patients with deletion 17p, particularly in the presence of complex karyotype.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Disease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLenalidomideLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedLenalidomideRituximabThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID24859876
PMCPMC4116834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.