ArticleHaematologica2014
Outcomes of first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 17p deletion.
Article in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Depth and durability of response to ibrutinib in CLL: 5-year follow-up of a phase 2 study.Blood · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Ibrutinib for previously untreated and relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with TP53 aberrations: a phase 2, single-arm trial.The Lancet. Oncology · 2015Trial
- Real-world safety and effectiveness of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in CLL: the CLL-ZANU2024 Italian cohort.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Cytogenetic Subclone Burden: A New Biomarker Predicting Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Outcome.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- TP53-altered chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with firstline Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based therapy: A retrospective analysis.American journal of hematology · 2022Article
- Clinical experiences with venetoclax and other pro-apoptotic agents in lymphoid malignancies: lessons from monotherapy and chemotherapy combination.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- Zanubrutinib monotherapy for patients with treatment naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 17p deletionHaematologica · 2021Article
- Ibrutinib combinations in CLL therapy: scientific rationale and clinical results.Blood cancer journal · 2021Review
- Treatment Approaches to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With High-Risk Molecular Features.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- UGT2B17 modifies drug response in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.British journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Is There a Role for Chemotherapy in the Era of Targeted Therapies?Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020Review
- Promises and pitfalls of targeted agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020Review
- Highly Sensitive and Accurate Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using the Novel CD160-ROR1 Assay.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Ibrutinib in B-cell lymphoma: single fighter might be enough?Cancer cell international · 2020Review
- Efficacy of Ibrutinib-Based Regimen in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review.Journal of hematology · 2019Review
- Clinicohematological parameters and outcomes in a cohort of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with Deletion 17p from Pakistan.Blood research · 2018Article
- Selecting Frontline Therapy for CLL in 2018.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018Review
- The Genomics and Molecular Biology of Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: Opportunities for Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although uncommon in treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, deletion 17p is a high-risk disease characteristic. We analyzed and reported outcomes for 63 patients with deletion 17p chronic lymphocytic leukemia who received first-line therapy at our institution; at time of first treatment, 81% had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene and 58% had complex karyotype. Forty-nine patients (76%) received first-line fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab-based therapy, 6 (11%) received rituximab-based and 8 (13%) received lenalidomide-based treatment. Overall, the complete plus nodular partial remission rate was 33%; on multivariable model, higher complete plus nodular partial remission rate was observed in patients with less than 50% cells positive for deletion 17p, and a higher probability of achieving at least a partial remission was observed with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab-based treatment. After a median follow up of 33 months (range 1-89 months), the estimated median progression-free survival was 14 months (95% confidence interval 10-18) and estimated median overall survival was 63 months (95% confidence interval 43-83). In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with longer progression-free survival were response to treatment and absence of complex karyotype. Achievement of complete plus nodular partial remission rate and mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene were independently associated with longer overall survival in multivariable model. Complex karyotype was associated with increased risk for Richter's transformation. New first-line strategies and agents must aim at both improving response and maintaining remission in patients with deletion 17p, particularly in the presence of complex karyotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.