Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24859870›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2014

Validating self-reported mammography use in vulnerable communities: findings and recommendations.

Kristi L Allgood, Garth H Rauscher, Steven Whitman, Giselle Vasquez-Jones, Ami M Shah

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Racial Disparities in Diagnostic Delay Among Women With Breast Cancer.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Lack of validity of self-reported mammography data.Family medicine and community health · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy among immigrant women.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristi L AllgoodSinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System; kristi.allgood@sinai.org.
Garth H RauscherDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Steven WhitmanSinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System;
Giselle Vasquez-JonesSinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System;
Ami M ShahUCLA Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

UIC CENTERS FOR POPULATION HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIESP50CA106743 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WARNECKE, RICHARD · 2003 to 2016
$19.3M
Comparative effectiveness of breast imaging modalities: a natural experimentR01HS018366 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RAUSCHER, GARTH H · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS 1 R01 HS018366-01A1AHRQ HHS R01 HS018366NCI NIH HHS P50 CA106743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost health surveys ask women whether they have had a recent mammogram, all of which report mammography use (past 2 years) at about 70% to 80% regardless of race or residence. We examined the potential extent of overreporting of mammography use in low income African-American and Latina women, and whether self-report inaccuracies might bias estimated associations between patient characteristics and mammography use.

methodsUsing venue-based sampling in two poor communities on the west side of Chicago, we asked eligible women living in two west side communities of Chicago to complete a survey about breast health (n = 2,200) and to provide consent to view their medical record. Of the 1,909 women who screened eligible for medical record review, 1,566 consented (82%). We obtained medical records of all women who provided both permission and a valid local mammography facility (n = 1,221). We compared the self-reported responses from the survey with the imaging reports found in the medical record (documented). To account for missing data, we conducted multiple imputations for key demographic variables and report standard measures of accuracy.

resultsAlthough 73% of women self-reported a mammogram in the last 2 years, only 44% of self-reports were documented. Overreporting of mammography use was observed for all three ethnic groups.

conclusionsThese results suggest considerable overestimation of prevalence of use in these vulnerable populations. IMPACT: Relying on known faulty self-reported mammography data as a measure of mammography use provides an overly optimistic picture of utilization, a problem that may be exacerbated in vulnerable minority communities.

Indexed as

Self ReportAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanChicagoFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPovertyPoverty AreasUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID24859870
PMCPMC4135480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.